Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Feb 14:2019:2042459.
doi: 10.1155/2019/2042459. eCollection 2019.

Clinicopathological Review of 547 Bulbar Enucleations in Hungary (2006-2017)

Affiliations

Clinicopathological Review of 547 Bulbar Enucleations in Hungary (2006-2017)

Gábor Tóth et al. J Ophthalmol. .

Abstract

Purpose: To analyse current clinicopathological enucleation indications in a large third-referral centre in a developed country (Hungary) over a period of 12 years.

Methods: Retrospective review was performed on 547 enucleated eyes of 543 patients (48.6% males, age 52.7 ± 24.5 years) who were operated on between 2006 and 2017 at the Department of Ophthalmology of Semmelweis University, in Budapest, Hungary. For each subject, clinicopathological data, including patient demographics, indications for enucleation, B-scan ultrasound reports, operative details, and histopathological analyses, were reviewed. Primary enucleation indications were classified into trauma, tumours, systemic diseases, surgical diseases, infections or inflammations, miscellaneous diseases, and unclassifiable groups. Clinical immediate enucleation indications were classified as tumours, atrophia or phthisis bulbi, infection or inflammation, painful blind eye due to glaucoma, acute trauma, threatening or spontaneous perforation, cosmetic causes, and expulsive bleeding.

Results: The most common primary enucleation indications were tumours (47.3%), trauma (16.8%), surgical diseases (15.7%), infection or inflammation (11.6%), systemic diseases (5.1%), miscellaneous diseases (2.0%), and unclassifiable diseases (1.5%). Clinical immediate enucleation indications were tumours (46.1%), atrophia or phthisis bulbi (18.5%), infection or inflammation (18.5%), painful blind eye due to glaucoma (11.2%), acute trauma (3.7%), threatening or spontaneous perforation (1.3%), cosmetic reasons (0.5%), and expulsive bleeding (0.4%).

Conclusions: Intraocular tumours represent the most common clinicopathological indication for ocular enucleation in our study population. Following ocular trauma and systemic diseases, the rate of enucleation decreased in the last decade, compared to those previously reported in other developed countries. However, changes were not observed for surgical diseases, infectious and inflammatory causes, or for miscellaneous and unclassified diseases. Orbital implant financing should be increased to ensure better postoperative aesthetic rehabilitation, following enucleation in Hungary.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Age distribution of patients (each 5 years of age) at the time of enucleation with the primary enucleation indication of retinoblastoma, uveal melanoma, and other diseases, between January 2006 and December 2017 at the Department of Ophthalmology of Semmelweis University (Budapest, Hungary) (547 eyes of 543 patients).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Sex distribution of patients who underwent enucleation (547 eyes of 543 patients) between January 2006 and December 2017 at the Department of Ophthalmology of Semmelweis University (Budapest, Hungary), distributed among primary enucleation indications. The numbers of patients in different groups were 259 for tumours, 92 for trauma, 86 for surgical diseases, 63 for infection or inflammation, 28 for systemic, 11 for miscellaneous diseases, and 8 not classified.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Percentages of primary enucleation indications between January 2006 and December 2017 at the Department of Ophthalmology of Semmelweis University (Budapest, Hungary).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Primary enucleation indications between January 2006 and December 2017 at the Department of Ophthalmology of Semmelweis University (Budapest, Hungary).

References

    1. Soares Í. P., França V. P. Evisceration and enucleation. Seminars in Ophthalmology. 2010;25(3):94–97. doi: 10.3109/08820538.2010.488575. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stiebel H., Sela M., Peer J. Changing indications for enucleations in Hadassah University Hospital, 1960–1989. Ophthalmic Epidemiology. 2009;2(3):123–127. doi: 10.3109/09286589509057093. - DOI - PubMed
    1. de Gottrau P., Holbach L. M., Naumann G. O. Clinicopathological review of 1146 enucleations (1980–90) British Journal of Ophthalmology. 1994;78(4):260–265. doi: 10.1136/bjo.78.4.260. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cheng G. Y., Li B., Li L. Q., et al. Review of 1375 enucleations in the Tongren Eye Centre, Beijing. Eye. 2007;22(11):1404–1409. doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6702919. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ababneh O. H., AboTaleb E. A., Abu Ameerh M. A., Yousef Y. A. Enucleation and evisceration at a tertiary care hospital in a developing country. BMC Ophthalmolomy. 2015;15(1) doi: 10.1186/s12886-015-0108-x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources