Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1978 Oct;62(4):789-96.
doi: 10.1172/JCI109190.

Suppressor-cell dysfunction in systemic lupus erythematosus. Cells involved and in vitro correction

Suppressor-cell dysfunction in systemic lupus erythematosus. Cells involved and in vitro correction

A Sagawa et al. J Clin Invest. 1978 Oct.

Abstract

To characterize the cell(s) responsible for the suppressor-cell dysfunction in active systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), we fractionated blood mononuclear cells into thymus-derived (T), bone marrow-derived (B), and monocyte-depleted populations. Various cell populations from active SLE, inactive SLE, or normals, were activated with Concanavalin A, washed, and then co-cultured with active SLE cells. Soluble immune response suppressor (SIRS) from culture supernates of the activated cells was also used for the possible correction of the suppressor-cell dysfunction. Suppression was tested by enumerating DNA-binding cells by radioautography and by quantitating anti-DNA antibody in culture supernates by radioimmunoassay; and immunoglobulin was tested in cells and supernates by the immunofluorescence and the immunofluor techniques, respectively. Except for the numbers of DNA-binding cells, which were not suppressed, all the other three parameters in co-cultures with cells from active SLE patients were suppressed by Concanavalin A-activated cells (P < 0.001), or by SIRS (P < 0.05) from normals or inactive SLE patients. Concanavalin A-activated autologous or allogeneic active SLE cells and nonactivated cells from active or inactive SLE failed to suppress the various B-cell functions. Nonactivated normal cells suppressed levels of anti-DNA and immunoglobulin in supernates (P < 0.05). In characterizing the cells responsible for the suppressor dysfunction, it was clear from the results that T cells responsive to Concanavalin A activation are deficient in active SLE and fail to generate SIRS. On the other hand, monocytes from active SLE patients are responsive to signals from the activated T cells of normals or inactive SLE donors. Because SIRS suppresses active SLE cells in vitro, it might be considered therapeutically for the in vivo modulation of SLE.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Clin Haematol. 1977 Jun;6(2):439-78 - PubMed
    1. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1977;41 Pt 1:93-103 - PubMed
    1. Arthritis Rheum. 1977 Jun;20(5):1049-57 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 1977 Jul 21;297(3):121-7 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Invest. 1978 Mar;61(3):738-43 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms