The phenotype of recovery III: Delay discounting predicts abstinence self-efficacy among individuals in recovery from substance use disorders
- PMID: 30896193
- PMCID: PMC6483840
- DOI: 10.1037/adb0000460
The phenotype of recovery III: Delay discounting predicts abstinence self-efficacy among individuals in recovery from substance use disorders
Abstract
Abstinence self-efficacy (ASE) and delay discounting predict treatment outcomes and risk of relapse. Associations between delay discounting and ASE among individuals in recovery from substance use have not been investigated. Data from 216 individuals in recovery from substance abuse recruited from The International Quit & Recovery Registry, an ongoing online data collection program used to understand addiction and how people succeed in recovery, were included in the analysis. Discounting rates were assessed using an adjusting-delay task, and ASE was assessed using the Relapse Situation Efficacy Questionnaire (RSEQ). Delay discounting was a significant predictor of ASE, even after controlling for age, gender, race, ethnicity, annual income, education level, marital status, and primary addiction. Context-specific factors of relapse included Negative Affect, Positive Affect, Restrictive Situations (to drug use), Idle Time, Social-Food Situations, Low Arousal, and Craving. A principal component analysis of RSEQ factors in the current sample revealed that self-efficacy scores were primarily unidimensional and not situation specific. The current study expands the generality of delay discounting and indicates that discounting rates predict ASE among individuals in recovery from substance use disorders. This finding supports the recent characterizations of delay discounting as a candidate behavioral marker of addiction and may serve as a basis to better identify and target subgroups that need unique or more intensive interventions to address higher risks of relapse and increase their likelihood of abstinence. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
Conflict of interest statement
We (the authors) declare that we have no significant competing financial, professional or personal interests that might have influenced the performance or presentation of the work described in this manuscript.
Figures
References
-
- American Addiction Centers. (2018). Statistics on Drug Addiction. Retrieved September 19, 2018, from https://americanaddictioncenters.org/rehab-guide/addiction-statistics/
-
- Baer JS, Holt CS, & Lichtenstein E (1986). Self-efficacy and smoking reexamined: construct validity and clinical utility. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54(6), 846–852. - PubMed
-
- Baker F, Johnson MW, & Bickel WK (2003). Delay discounting in current and never-before cigarette smokers: similarities and differences across commodity, sign, and magnitude. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112(3), 382–392. - PubMed