Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Apr;38(4):334-342.
doi: 10.1037/hea0000727.

Delay discounting and household food purchasing decisions: The SHoPPER study

Affiliations

Delay discounting and household food purchasing decisions: The SHoPPER study

Bradley M Appelhans et al. Health Psychol. 2019 Apr.

Abstract

Objective: Delay discounting is a neurocognitive trait that has been linked to poor nutritional health and obesity, but its role in specific dietary choices is unclear. This study tested whether individual differences in delay discounting are related to the healthfulness of household food purchases and reliance on nonstore food sources such as restaurants.

Method: The food purchases of 202 primary household food shoppers were objectively documented for 14 days through a food receipt collection and analysis protocol. The nutrient content of household food purchases was derived for each participant, and the overall diet quality (Healthy Eating Index-2015) and energy density (kcal/g) of foods and beverages were calculated. The proportion of energy from nonstore food sources was also derived. Delay discounting was assessed with a choice task featuring hypothetical monetary rewards.

Results: Data were available for 12,624 foods and beverages purchased across 2,340 shopping episodes. Approximately 13% of energy was purchased from restaurants and other nonstore food sources. Steeper discounting rates were associated with lower overall Healthy Eating Index-2015 scores and a higher energy density (kcal/g) of purchased foods. Associations were attenuated but remained statistically significant when accounting for body mass index and sociodemographic variables. Discounting rates were unrelated to reliance on nonstore food sources or the energy density of purchased beverages.

Conclusions: Delay discounting is related to the healthfulness of food purchases among primary household shoppers. As food purchasing is a key antecedent of dietary intake, delay discounting may be a viable target in dietary and weight management interventions. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02073643.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests. The authors have no competing interests to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Predicted association between delay discounting (area under the curve of indifference points) and the diet quality of household food purchases based on the Healthy Eating Index-2015, adjusted for demographic factors and body mass index. Higher values for delay discounting reflect a lower discounting rate, or less impulsive responding on the task.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Predicted association between delay discounting (area under the curve of indifference points) and the energy density (kcal/g) of purchased foods, adjusted for demographic factors and BMI. Higher values for delay discounting reflect a lower discounting rate, or less impulsive responding on the task.

References

    1. Adam A, & Jensen JD (2016). What is the effectiveness of obesity related interventions at retail grocery stores and supermarkets? -a systematic review. BMC Public Health, 16(1), 1247. doi:10.1186/s12889-016-3985-x - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Amlung M, Petker T, Jackson J, Balodis I, & MacKillop J (2016). Steep discounting of delayed monetary and food rewards in obesity: a meta-analysis. Psychological Medicine, 46(11), 2423–2434. doi:10.1017/s0033291716000866 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Amlung M, Vedelago L, Acker J, Balodis I, & MacKillop J (2017). Steep delay discounting and addictive behavior: a meta-analysis of continuous associations. Addiction, 112(1), 51–62. doi:10.1111/add.13535 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. An R (2013). Effectiveness of subsidies in promoting healthy food purchases and consumption: a review of field experiments. Public Health Nutrition, 16(7), 1215–1228. doi:10.1017/s1368980012004715 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Andreyeva T, Long MW, & Brownell KD (2010). The impact of food prices on consumption: a systematic review of research on the price elasticity of demand for food. American Journal of Public Health, 100(2), 216–222. doi:10.2105/ajph.2008.151415 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Associated data