Prospective Investigation of the Operating Room Time-Out Process
- PMID: 30896592
- PMCID: PMC6813865
- DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004126
Prospective Investigation of the Operating Room Time-Out Process
Abstract
Background: Although the surgical pause or time-out is a required part of most hospitals' standard operating procedures, little is known about the quality of execution of the time-out in routine clinical practice. An interactive electronic time-out was implemented to increase surgical team compliance with the time-out procedure and to improve communication among team members in the operating room. We sought to identify nonroutine events that occur during the time-out procedure in the operating room, including distractions and interruptions, deviations from protocol, and the problem-solving strategies used by operating room team members to mitigate them.
Methods: Direct observations of surgical time-outs were performed on 166 nonemergent surgeries in 2016. For each time-out, the observers recorded compliance with each step, any nonroutine events that may have occurred, and whether any operating room team members were distracted.
Results: The time-out procedure was performed before the first incision in 100% of cases. An announcement was made to indicate the start of the time-out procedure in 163 of 166 observed surgeries. Most observed time-outs were completed in <1 minute. Most time-outs were completed without interruption (92.8%). The most common reason for an interruption was to verify patient information. Ten time-out procedures were stopped due to a safety concern. At least 1 member of the operating room team was actively distracted in 10.2% of the time-out procedures observed.
Conclusions: Compliance with preincision time-outs is high at our institution, and nonroutine events are a rare occurrence. It is common for ≥1 member of the operating room team to be actively distracted during time-out procedures, even though most time-outs are completed in under 1 minute. Despite distractions, there were no wrong-site or wrong-person surgeries reported at our hospital during the study period. We conclude that the simple act of performing a preprocedure checklist may be completed quickly, but that distractions are common.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Comment in
-
Time-Out and Distraction: Performing Checklists After the Plane Has Taken Off.Anesth Analg. 2020 Apr;130(4):e109. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004338. Anesth Analg. 2020. PMID: 31335397 No abstract available.
-
In Response.Anesth Analg. 2020 Apr;130(4):e109-e110. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004339. Anesth Analg. 2020. PMID: 31335401 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Logan CA, Cressey BD, Wu RY, et al. Monitoring universal protocol compliance through real-time clandestine observation by medical students results in performance improvement. J Surg Educ. 2012;69:41–46. - PubMed
-
- The Joint Commission. The Universal Protocol for Preventing Wrong Site, Wrong Procedure, and Wrong Person Surgery. 2011. Available at: https://www.jointcommission.org/standards_information/up.aspx. Accessed March 5, 2019.
-
- Johnston G, Ekert L, Pally E. Surgical site signing and “time out”: issues of compliance or complacence. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91:2577–2580. - PubMed
-
- Weiser TG, Haynes AB, Dziekan G, Berry WR, Lipsitz SR, Gawande AA; Safe Surgery Saves Lives Investigators and Study Group. Effect of a 19-item surgical safety checklist during urgent operations in a global patient population. Ann Surg. 2010;251:976–980. - PubMed
-
- Haynes AB, Weiser TG, Berry WR, et al.; Safe Surgery Saves Lives Study Group. A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:491–499. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources