Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 May;109(5):799-805.
doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2019.305006. Epub 2019 Mar 21.

Pregnancy Outcomes in US Prisons, 2016-2017

Carolyn Sufrin  1 , Lauren Beal  1 , Jennifer Clarke  1 , Rachel Jones  1 , William D Mosher  1
Affiliations

Pregnancy Outcomes in US Prisons, 2016-2017

Carolyn Sufrin et al. Am J Public Health. 2019 May.

Erratum in

  • ERRATUM.
    [No authors listed] [No authors listed] Am J Public Health. 2020 Feb;110(2):e1. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2019.305006e. Am J Public Health. 2020. PMID: 31913669 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

Abstract

Objectives: To collect national data on pregnancy frequencies and outcomes among women in US state and federal prisons.

Methods: From 2016 to 2017, we prospectively collected 12 months of pregnancy statistics from a geographically diverse sample of 22 state prison systems and the Federal Bureau of Prisons. Prisons reported numbers of pregnant women, births, miscarriages, abortions, and other outcomes.

Results: Overall, 1396 pregnant women were admitted to prisons; 3.8% of newly admitted women and 0.6% of all women were pregnant in December 2016. There were 753 live births (92% of outcomes), 46 miscarriages (6%), 11 abortions (1%), 4 stillbirths (0.5%), 3 newborn deaths, and no maternal deaths. Six percent of live births were preterm and 30% were cesarean deliveries. Distributions of outcomes varied by state.

Conclusions: Our study showed that the majority of prison pregnancies ended in live births or miscarriages. Our findings can enable policymakers, researchers, and public health practitioners to optimize health outcomes for incarcerated pregnant women and their newborns, whose health has broad sociopolitical implications.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Minor-Harper S. Prisoners in State and Federal Institutions, December 31, 1980. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice; 1982.
    1. Carson E. Prisoners in 2016. Available at: https://www.bjs.gov/index.cfm?ty=pbdetail&iid=6187. Accessed March 6, 2019.
    1. Prison Policy Initiative. States of women’s incarceration: the global context 2018. Available at: https://www.prisonpolicy.org/global/women/2018.html. Accessed March 6, 2019.
    1. Sawyer W. The Gender Divide: Tracking Women’s State Prison Growth. Northampton, MA: Prison Policy Initiative; 2018.
    1. Clarke JG, Hebert MR, Rosengard C, Rose JS, DaSilva KM, Stein MD. Reproductive health care and family planning needs among incarcerated women. Am J Public Health. 2006;96(5):834–839. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types