Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Oct;43(5):221-227.
doi: 10.1192/bjb.2019.20. Epub 2019 Mar 22.

Patient-reported outcome measures in community mental health teams: pragmatic evaluation of PHQ-9, GAD-7 and SWEMWBS

Paul Blenkiron  1 , Lucy Goldsmith  2
Affiliations

Patient-reported outcome measures in community mental health teams: pragmatic evaluation of PHQ-9, GAD-7 and SWEMWBS

Paul Blenkiron et al. BJPsych Bull. 2019 Oct.

Abstract

Aims and methodWe evaluated routine use, acceptability and response rates for the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), Generalised Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7) and Short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (SWEMWBS) within adult community mental health teams. Measures were repeated 3 months later. Professionals recorded the setting, refusal rates and cluster diagnosis. RESULTS: A total of 245 patients completed 674 measures, demonstrating good initial return rates (81%), excellent scale completion (98-99%) and infrequent refusal/unsuitability (11%). Only 32 (13%) returned follow-up measures. Significant improvements occurred in functioning (P = 0.01), PHQ-9 (P = 0.02) and GAD-7 (P = 0.003) scores (Cohen's d = 0.52-0.77) but not in SWEMWBS (P = 0.91) scores. Supercluster A had higher initial PHQ-9 and GAD-7 scores (P < 0.001) and lower SWEMWBS scores (P = 0.003) than supercluster B. Supercluster C showed the greatest functional impairment (P = 0.003).Clinical implicationsPHQ-9 and GAD-7 appear acceptable as patient-reported outcome measures in community mental health team. SWEMWBS seems insensitive to change. National outcome programmes should ensure good follow-up rates.Declaration of interestNone.

Keywords: Community mental health teams; out-patient treatment; outcome studies; patients; rating scales.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of interest: None.

References

    1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Commissioning Stepped Care for People with Common Mental Health Disorders: Guide & Bench Marking Tool CMG41. NICE, 2011. (http://www.nice.org.uk/usingguidance/commissioningguides/commonmentalhea...).
    1. Tadros G. Intelligent outcome measures in liaison psychiatry: essential even if not desirable. BJPsych Bull 2016; 40: 195–8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Department of Health. The IAPT Data Handbook Version 2.0: Guidance on Recording and Monitoring Outcomes to Support Local Evidence-Based Practice. Department of Health, 2011. (http://www.iapt.nhs.uk/).
    1. Department of Health. NHS Outcomes Framework: List of Outcomes and Indicators in the NHS Outcomes Framework for 2016-17. Department of Health, 2016. (https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/nhs-outcomes-framework-2016-t...).
    1. Department of Health. The Operating Framework for the NHS in England 2012/2013. Department of Health, 2011.

LinkOut - more resources