Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2019 May:100:1-7.
doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2019.02.001. Epub 2019 Feb 7.

Cost-effectiveness of individual versus group female-specific cognitive behavioral therapy for alcohol use disorder

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Cost-effectiveness of individual versus group female-specific cognitive behavioral therapy for alcohol use disorder

Todd A Olmstead et al. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2019 May.

Abstract

Objective: To determine the relative cost-effectiveness of individual female-specific cognitive behavioral therapy (I-FS-CBT) versus group female-specific cognitive behavioral therapy (G-FS-CBT).

Methods: This cost-effectiveness study is based on a randomized controlled trial in which 155 women seeking treatment for alcohol use disorder at an academic outpatient clinic were randomized to 12 manual-guided sessions of I-FS-CBT (n = 75) or G-FS-CBT (n = 80). The primary patient outcomes were the number of drinking days and the number of heavy drinking days during the 12-week treatment and 1-year follow-up periods. All cost data (including resource utilizations) were collected prospectively alongside the trial. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios and cost-effectiveness acceptability curves were used to determine the cost-effectiveness of I-FS-CBT relative to G-FS-CBT. Results are presented from the provider perspective.

Results: During the 12-week treatment period, G-FS-CBT is likely to be cost-effective when the threshold value to decision-makers of one fewer drinking day (or one fewer day of heavy drinking) is less than $141 (or $258), and I-FS-CBT is likely to be cost-effective if the threshold is greater than $141 (or $258). During the 1-year follow-up period, G-FS-CBT is likely to be cost-effective when the threshold value to decision-makers of one fewer drinking day (or one fewer day of heavy drinking) is less than $54 (or $169), and I-FS-CBT is likely to be cost-effective if the threshold is greater than $54 (or $169). The results are robust to sensitivity analyses on several key cost parameters.

Conclusions: Compared to I-FS-CBT, G-FS-CBT holds promise as a cost-effective approach, in both the short run and the long run, for improving drinking outcomes of women with alcohol use disorder.

Keywords: Alcohol use disorder; Cognitive behavioral therapy; Cost effectiveness; Female specific therapy; Women.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations of Interest: None

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves showing the probability that I-FS-CBT is cost-effective, compared to G-FS-CBT, for ‘number drinking days’ and ‘number of heavy drinking days’ during the (a) 12-week treatment period, and (b) 1-year follow-up period. For a given threshold value, the probability that I-FS-CBT is cost-effective compared to G-FS-CBT is equivalent to the proportion of the 2000 bootstrapped replicates for which I-FS-CBT had the highest net benefit (Fenwick, Claxton, & Schulpher, 2001)

References

    1. Abulseoud OA, Karpyak VM, Schneekloth T, Hall-Flavin DK, Loukianova LL, Geske JR, & Frye MA (2013). A retrospective study of gender differences in depressive symptoms and risk of relapse in patients with alcohol dependence. The American Journal on Addictions, 22, 437–442. - PMC - PubMed
    1. APA. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, fourth edition, text revision Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
    1. Ashley OS, Marsden ME, & Brady TM (2003). Effectiveness of substance abuse treatment programming for women: A review. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 29, 19–53. - PubMed
    1. Briggs A (2001). Handling uncertainty in economic evaluation and presenting the results In Drummond M, & McGuire A. (Eds.) Economic evaluation in health care: Merging theory with practice (pp.172–214). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
    1. Briggs A, & O’Brien B (2001). The death of cost-minimization analysis? Health Economics, 10, 179–184. - PubMed

Publication types