Cost-effectiveness of individual versus group female-specific cognitive behavioral therapy for alcohol use disorder
- PMID: 30898323
- PMCID: PMC6432929
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jsat.2019.02.001
Cost-effectiveness of individual versus group female-specific cognitive behavioral therapy for alcohol use disorder
Abstract
Objective: To determine the relative cost-effectiveness of individual female-specific cognitive behavioral therapy (I-FS-CBT) versus group female-specific cognitive behavioral therapy (G-FS-CBT).
Methods: This cost-effectiveness study is based on a randomized controlled trial in which 155 women seeking treatment for alcohol use disorder at an academic outpatient clinic were randomized to 12 manual-guided sessions of I-FS-CBT (n = 75) or G-FS-CBT (n = 80). The primary patient outcomes were the number of drinking days and the number of heavy drinking days during the 12-week treatment and 1-year follow-up periods. All cost data (including resource utilizations) were collected prospectively alongside the trial. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios and cost-effectiveness acceptability curves were used to determine the cost-effectiveness of I-FS-CBT relative to G-FS-CBT. Results are presented from the provider perspective.
Results: During the 12-week treatment period, G-FS-CBT is likely to be cost-effective when the threshold value to decision-makers of one fewer drinking day (or one fewer day of heavy drinking) is less than $141 (or $258), and I-FS-CBT is likely to be cost-effective if the threshold is greater than $141 (or $258). During the 1-year follow-up period, G-FS-CBT is likely to be cost-effective when the threshold value to decision-makers of one fewer drinking day (or one fewer day of heavy drinking) is less than $54 (or $169), and I-FS-CBT is likely to be cost-effective if the threshold is greater than $54 (or $169). The results are robust to sensitivity analyses on several key cost parameters.
Conclusions: Compared to I-FS-CBT, G-FS-CBT holds promise as a cost-effective approach, in both the short run and the long run, for improving drinking outcomes of women with alcohol use disorder.
Keywords: Alcohol use disorder; Cognitive behavioral therapy; Cost effectiveness; Female specific therapy; Women.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
References
-
- APA. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, fourth edition, text revision Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
-
- Ashley OS, Marsden ME, & Brady TM (2003). Effectiveness of substance abuse treatment programming for women: A review. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 29, 19–53. - PubMed
-
- Briggs A (2001). Handling uncertainty in economic evaluation and presenting the results In Drummond M, & McGuire A. (Eds.) Economic evaluation in health care: Merging theory with practice (pp.172–214). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
-
- Briggs A, & O’Brien B (2001). The death of cost-minimization analysis? Health Economics, 10, 179–184. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
