Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 May;25(3):7-16.
doi: 10.21315/mjms2018.25.3.2. Epub 2018 Jun 28.

Metabolic Interplay between Tumour Cells and Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts (CAFs) under Hypoxia versus Normoxia

Affiliations
Review

Metabolic Interplay between Tumour Cells and Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts (CAFs) under Hypoxia versus Normoxia

Septelia Inawati Wanandi et al. Malays J Med Sci. 2018 May.

Abstract

The growth of tumour cells is closely related to cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) present within their microenvironment. CAFs, the most abundant cells in tumour stroma, secrete growth factors that play pivotal roles in tumour cell proliferation, metabolism, angiogenesis and metastasis. Tumour cells adapt to rapid environmental changes from normoxia to hypoxia through metabolic interplay with CAFs. In this mini review, we discuss the role of lactate dehydrogenases (LDHs) and monocarboxylate transporters (MCTs) on the metabolic interplay between tumour cells and CAFs under hypoxia compared to normoxia. The LDHs catalyse the interchange of lactate and pyruvate, whereas MCTs facilitate the influx and efflux of monocarboxylates, especially lactate and pyruvate. To sum up, tumour cells switch their metabolic state between glycolysis and oxidative phosphorylation through metabolic interplay with CAFs, which exhibit the Warburg effect under hypoxia and reverse Warburg effect under normoxia.

Keywords: Warburg effect; cancer-associated fibroblasts; hypoxia; lactate dehydrogenases; monocarboxylate transporters; reverse Warburg effect.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic representation of the differences between oxidative phosphorylation. A. Anaerobic glycolysis in normal cells. B. Anaerobic glycolysis in tumour cells (Warburg effect)
Figure 2
Figure 2
Metabolic interplay between glycolytic tumour cells and oxidative CAFs in hypoxia (Warburg effect)
Figure 3
Figure 3
Metabolic interplay between oxidative tumour cells and glycolytic CAFs in normoxia (Reverse Warburg effect)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. World Health Organization. Health topics: cancer. [Internet] 2017. [cited 2017 Feb 24]. Available from: http://www.who.int/topics/cancer/en/
    1. Miles FL, Sikes RA. Insidious changes in stromal matrix fuel cancer progression. Mol Cancer Res. 2014;12(3):297–312. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-13-0535. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Quail DF, Joyce JA. Microenvironmental regulation of tumor progression and metastasis. Nat Med. 2013;19(11):1423–1437. doi: 10.1038/nm.3394. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Xing Y, Zhao S, Zhou BP, Mi J. Metabolic reprogramming of the tumor microenvironment. FEBS J. 2015;282(20):3892–3898. doi: 10.1111/febs.13402. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Augsten M. Cancer-associated fibroblasts as another polarized cell type of the tumor microenvironment. Front Oncol. 2014;4:62. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2014.00062. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources