Trochanteric Fixation Nail® with Helical Blade Compared with Femoral Neck Screw for Operative Treatment of Intertrochanteric Femoral Fractures
- PMID: 30899715
- PMCID: PMC6414409
- DOI: 10.5371/hp.2019.31.1.48
Trochanteric Fixation Nail® with Helical Blade Compared with Femoral Neck Screw for Operative Treatment of Intertrochanteric Femoral Fractures
Erratum in
-
Erratum.Hip Pelvis. 2019 Jun;31(2):128. doi: 10.5371/hp.2019.31.2.128. Epub 2019 May 30. Hip Pelvis. 2019. PMID: 31198781 Free PMC article.
Abstract
Purpose: This study was performed to compare outcomes of the Trochanteric Fixation Nail (TFN®) with a helical blade versus TFN® with a femoral neck screw for the treatment of intertrochanteric femoral fractures.
Materials and methods: A single center, retrospective cohort study. Patients (>18 years of age) with an intertrochanteric femoral fracture, who were operated on between January 1, 2012 and December 31, 2016 were included. Primary and secondary outcome measures were cut-out rate and intervention variables, respectively. Data from X-ray examinations and patient medical files were collected and analyzed. The chi-square test or Student's t-test were used for statistical analysis.
Results: A total of 631 patients were surgically treated for an intertrochanteric femoral fracture. Of this group, 239 patients (37.9%) were treated with a TFN® with helical blade and 392 patients (62.1%) with a TFN® with femoral neck screw. There were no statistically significant differences between the baseline characteristics of both groups. A total of 17 (2.7%) cut-outs were recorded, with no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P=0.19). Additionally, there were no statistically significant differences in the secondary outcome measures between the two groups.
Conclusion: There are no statistically significant differences in primary and secondary outcomes following treatment of intertrochanteric femur fracture with the TFN® helical blade or TFN® femoral neck screw. These findings suggest that the choice of collum implant for the surgical treatment of intertrochanteric femur fractures cannot be made based on the surgical outcomes of the two implants evaluated here.
Keywords: Cut-out; Femoral neck screw; Helical blade; Hip fractures; Trochanteric fixation nail.
Conflict of interest statement
CONFLICT OF INTEREST: The authors declare that there is no potential conflict of interest relevant to this article.
Figures
Comment in
-
Commentary on an Article by van Leur et al., "Trochanteric Fixation Nail® with Helical Blade Compared with Femoral Neck Screw for Operative Treatment of Intertrochanteric Femoral Fractures".Hip Pelvis. 2019 Sep;31(3):176-177. doi: 10.5371/hp.2019.31.3.176. Epub 2019 Aug 29. Hip Pelvis. 2019. PMID: 31501768 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Nederlandse Vereniging van Heelkunde; Nederlandse Orthopaedische Vereniging. Proximale femurfracturen [Internet] Utrecht: Nederlandse Vereniging van Heelkunde; 2016. [cited 2018 Nov 1]. Available from: https://richtlijnendatabase.nl/richtlijn/proximale_femurfracturen/proxim....
-
- Reindl R, Harvey EJ, Berry GK, Rahme E. Intramedullary versus extramedullary fixation for unstable intertrochanteric fractures: a prospective randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015;97:1905–1912. - PubMed
-
- Registratie LT. LTR factsheet [Internet] Landelijk Netwerk Acute Zorg; 2015. [2018 Nov 1]. Available from: http://www.nazl.nl/sites/nazl/files/ltr_2012_factsheetheupfracturen_1406....
-
- van Santen M. Waarom heeft een gebroken heup zulke grote consequenties? Plus Magazine. 2016. [cited 2018 Nov 1]. Available from: https://www.plusonline.nl/versleten-heup/waarom-heeft-een-gebroken-heup-....
-
- Müller ME, Allgöwer M, Schneide R, Willenegger H. Manual of internal fixation: techniques recommended by the AO-ASIF group. 3rd ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1991.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources