Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jun;67(6):1286-1294.
doi: 10.1111/jgs.15773. Epub 2019 Mar 22.

Review of Programs to Combat Elder Mistreatment: Focus on Hospitals and Level of Resources Needed

Tony Rosen  1 , Alyssa Elman  1 , Sarah Dion  2 , Diana Delgado  3 , Michelle Demetres  3 , Risa Breckman  4 , Kristin Lees  5 , Kim Dash  5 , Debi Lang  6 , Alice Bonner  7   8 , Jason Burnett  9 , Carmel B Dyer  9 , Rani Snyder  10 , Amy Berman  10 , Terry Fulmer  10 , Mark S Lachs  4 ; National Collaboratory to Address Elder Mistreatment Project Team
Affiliations

Review of Programs to Combat Elder Mistreatment: Focus on Hospitals and Level of Resources Needed

Tony Rosen et al. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 Jun.

Abstract

Background: Elder mistreatment is common and has serious social and medical consequences for victims. Though programs to combat this mistreatment have been developed and implemented for more than three decades, previous systematic literature reviews have found few successful ones.

Objective: To conduct a more comprehensive examination of programs to improve elder mistreatment identification, intervention, or prevention, including those that had not undergone evaluation.

Design: Systematic review.

Setting: Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO Elton B. Stephens Co. (EBSCO), AgeLine, CINAHL.

Measurements: We abstracted key information about each program and categorized programs into 14 types and 9 subtypes. For programs that reported an impact evaluation, we systematically assessed the study quality. We also systematically examined the potential for programs to be successfully implemented in environments with limited resources available.

Results: We found 116 articles describing 115 elder mistreatment programs. Of these articles, 43% focused on improving prevention, 50% focused on identification, and 95% focused on intervention, with 66% having multiple foci. The most common types of program were: educational (53%), multidisciplinary team (MDT) (21%), psychoeducation/therapy/counseling (15%), and legal services/support (8%). Of the programs, 13% integrated an acute-care hospital, 43% had high potential to work in low-resource environments, and 57% reported an attempt to evaluate program impact, but only 2% used a high-quality study design.

Conclusion: Many programs to combat elder mistreatment have been developed and implemented, with the majority focusing on education and MDT development. Though more than half reported evaluation of program impact, few used high-quality study design. Many have the potential to work in low-resource environments. Acute-care hospitals were infrequently integrated into programs.

Keywords: elder abuse; intervention; systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: TR’s participation has been supported by a GEMSSTAR (Grants for Early Medical and Surgical Subspecialists’ Transition to Aging Research) grant (R03 AG048109) and a Paul B. Beeson Emerging Leaders Career Development Award in Aging (K76 AG054866) from the National Institute on Aging. He is also the recipient of a Jahnigen Career Development Award, supported by the John A. Hartford Foundation, the American Geriatrics Society, the Emergency Medicine Foundation, and the Society of Academic Emergency Medicine.

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:. Identifying Elder abuse prevention, identification, and intervention strategies: Systematic literature review flow diagram
Note: Reasons for exclusion during screening and assessment of eligibility included: no description or evaluation of new program or intervention, description or evaluation of screening/identification tool, focus on: resident-to-resident elder mistreatment in nursing homes, reduction of nursing home restraint use, self-neglect, crime victimization.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. National Center for Elder Abuse. The Elder Justice Roadmap: A Stakeholder Initiative to Respond to an Emerging Health, Justice, Financial, and Social Crisis. [Online] https://www.justice.gov/file/852856/download. Accessed August 9, 2018.
    1. Elder Mistreatment: Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation in an Aging America. Washington D.C: National Academy of Sciences Press; 2003. - PubMed
    1. Under the Radar: New York State Elder Abuse Prevalence Study: Self-Reported Prevalence and Documented Case Surveys 2012. [On-line]. https://ocfs.ny.gov/main/reports/Under%20the%20Radar%2005%2012%2011%20fi.... Accessed August 9, 2018.
    1. Acierno R, Hernandez MA, Amstadter AB, et al. Prevalence and correlates of emotional, physical, sexual, and financial abuse and potential neglect in the United States: the National Elder Mistreatment Study. Am J Public Health 2010;100:292–7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lachs MS, Pillemer K. Elder abuse. Lancet 2004;364:1263–72. - PubMed

Publication types