Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2019 May 20;37(15):1285-1295.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.02403. Epub 2019 Mar 22.

Randomized Phase III Trial of Ibrutinib and Rituximab Plus Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, Vincristine, and Prednisone in Non-Germinal Center B-Cell Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Randomized Phase III Trial of Ibrutinib and Rituximab Plus Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, Vincristine, and Prednisone in Non-Germinal Center B-Cell Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

Anas Younes et al. J Clin Oncol. .

Abstract

Purpose: Ibrutinib has shown activity in non-germinal center B-cell diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). This double-blind phase III study evaluated ibrutinib and rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) in untreated non-germinal center B-cell DLBCL.

Patients and methods: Patients were randomly assigned at a one-to-one ratio to ibrutinib (560 mg per day orally) plus R-CHOP or placebo plus R-CHOP. The primary end point was event-free survival (EFS) in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population and the activated B-cell (ABC) DLBCL subgroup. Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety.

Results: A total of 838 patients were randomly assigned to ibrutinib plus R-CHOP (n = 419) or placebo plus R-CHOP (n = 419). Median age was 62.0 years; 75.9% of evaluable patients had ABC subtype disease, and baseline characteristics were balanced. Ibrutinib plus R-CHOP did not improve EFS in the ITT (hazard ratio [HR], 0.934) or ABC (HR, 0.949) population. A preplanned analysis showed a significant interaction between treatment and age. In patients age younger than 60 years, ibrutinib plus R-CHOP improved EFS (HR, 0.579), PFS (HR, 0.556), and OS (HR, 0.330) and slightly increased serious adverse events (35.7% v 28.6%), but the proportion of patients receiving at least six cycles of R-CHOP was similar between treatment arms (92.9% v 93.0%). In patients age 60 years or older, ibrutinib plus R-CHOP worsened EFS, PFS, and OS, increased serious adverse events (63.4% v 38.2%), and decreased the proportion of patients receiving at least six cycles of R-CHOP (73.7% v 88.8%).

Conclusion: The study did not meet its primary end point in the ITT or ABC population. However, in patients age younger than 60 years, ibrutinib plus R-CHOP improved EFS, PFS, and OS with manageable safety. In patients age 60 years or older, ibrutinib plus R-CHOP was associated with increased toxicity, leading to compromised R-CHOP administration and worse outcomes. Further investigation is warranted.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01855750.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG 1.
FIG 1.
Patient disposition. Random assignment was stratified by revised International Prognostic Index (1 to 2 v 3 to 5), region (United States/Western Europe v rest of world), and prespecified rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) cycle number (six v eight). COO, cell of origin; DLBCL, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; GCB, germinal B cell–like.
FIG 2.
FIG 2.
Kaplan-Meier survival curves for event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS). (A) Investigator-assessed EFS, intent-to-treat (ITT) population. (B) Investigator-assessed EFS, activated B cell–like population. (C) OS, ITT population. HR, hazard ratio; R-CHOP, rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone.
FIG 3.
FIG 3.
Hazard ratios (HRs) of overall survival (OS) by different discrete age groups. Bars indicate 95% CIs.
FIG 4.
FIG 4.
Kaplan-Meier survival curves for event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) by cutoff of age 60 years in the intent-to-treat population. (A) EFS, age younger than 60 years (n = 342). (B) OS, age younger than 60 years (n = 342). (C) EFS, age 60 years or older (n = 496). (D) OS, age 60 years or older (n = 496). HR, hazard ratio; R-CHOP, rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone.
FIG A1.
FIG A1.
Subgroup analysis of event-free survival (EFS) in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. ABC, activated B cell–like; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; GEP, gene expression profiling; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; R-CHOP, rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone; R-IPI, Revised International Prognostic Index.
FIG A2.
FIG A2.
Subgroup analysis of event-free survival (EFS) in patients age younger than 60 years. ABC, activated B cell–like; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; GCB, germinal center B cell–like; GEP, gene expression profiling; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; R-CHOP, rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone; R-IPI, Revised International Prognostic Index. (*) No patient had an R-IPI score of 5 because all patients were age younger than 60 years. (†) More than one extranodal lesion showed a hazard ratio of >1, but the CI was wide because of small event size.
FIG A3.
FIG A3.
Adverse event (AE) rate by age cutoffs. (A) Ibrutinib and rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) arm. (B) Placebo plus R-CHOP arm. TEAEs, treatment-emergent AEs.
FIG A4.
FIG A4.
Steady-state ibrutinib concentrations by age. Solid line represents median; dashed lines represent fifth and 95th percentiles. In previous studies, ibrutinib was administered at the following doses: chronic lymphocytic leukemia: ibrutinib 420 mg per day, CLL3001, PCYC 1112, PCYC 1115, PCYC 1117, and PCYC 1102; mantle cell lymphoma: ibrutinib 560 mg per day, PCYC 1104, MCL2001, and MCL3001; miscellaneous doses, PCYC 04753.

Comment in

References

    1. Stewart BW, Wild CP: World Cancer Report 2014. Lyon, France, IARC Press, 2014.
    1. Scott DW, Wright GW, Williams PM, et al. Determining cell-of-origin subtypes of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma using gene expression in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue. Blood. 2014;123:1214–1217. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alizadeh AA, Eisen MB, Davis RE, et al. Distinct types of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma identified by gene expression profiling. Nature. 2000;403:503–511. - PubMed
    1. Hans CP, Weisenburger DD, Greiner TC, et al. Confirmation of the molecular classification of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma by immunohistochemistry using a tissue microarray. Blood. 2004;103:275–282. - PubMed
    1. Tilly H, Gomes da Silva M, Vitolo U, et al: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL): ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 26:v116-v125, 2015 (suppl 5) - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data