Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Mar 22;14(3):e0214217.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214217. eCollection 2019.

Quality of life and burnout among faculty members: How much does the field of knowledge matter?

Priscila Castro Alves  1 , Aurea de Fatima Oliveira  2 , Helena Borges Martins da Silva Paro  3
Affiliations

Quality of life and burnout among faculty members: How much does the field of knowledge matter?

Priscila Castro Alves et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Faculty members face demands such as research, outreach programs, and management activities. Such demands may expose faculty to burnout. Burnout affects the physical, psychological and social health of faculty members, but it is still unclear how it affects their quality of life. We aimed to assess the impact of burnout on the quality of life (QoL) of faculty members from different fields of knowledge.

Methods: Cross-sectional study using validated tools for measuring burnout and QoL (Oldenburg Burnout Inventory-OLBI and World Health Organization Quality of Life-Abbreviated version-WHOQOL-Bref) in a sample of 366 faculty members from a public university. Scores were analyzed using Student's t-test, analysis of variance (ANOVA), binary logistic regression, and structural equation modeling (SEM).

Results: More than a third of the faculty members (n = 127; 36.6%) suffered from burnout. Men had higher scores of quality of life than women in the physical health (p = 0.001; d<0.5), psychological (p = 0.001; d<0.5) and social relationships (p = 0.048; d<0.5) domains. Women were more exhausted than men (p = 0.001; d<0.5). Faculty members' perception of quality of life and burnout did not differ according to their field of knowledge (p>0.05). Participants who felt tired before arriving at work were less likely to report good quality of life (OR = 0.46; 95% CI = 0.21-0.99). Faculty members who stated they needed more time to relax after work were less likely to be satisfied with their health (OR = 0.20; 95% CI = 0.10-0.40). Burnout showed a negative association with quality of life (λ = 0.87; p < 0,001; df = 8).

Conclusions: Burnout negatively affects faculty members' quality of life, regardless of their field of knowledge. Our results suggest the implementation of programs and actions to prevent burnout to faculty members, especially to women, as their quality of life may affect the quality of the education provided.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Structural equation modelling: Impact of burnout in faculty members’ quality of life.
Parameters: X2 = 30.962; X2/df = 3.84; RMR = 0.012; GFI = 0.972; AGFI = 0.926; CFI = 0.982; RMSEA = 0.091; p<0,001; df = 8.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Fernandes MH, Rocha VM. Impact of the psychosocial aspects of work on the quality of life of teachers. Rev Bras Psiquiatr. 2009; 31(1): 15–20. - PubMed
    1. Garcia AL, Oliveira ERA, Barros EB. Quality of life of superior education teachers in the health area: speech and daily practice. Cogitare Enfermagem. 2008; 13(1): 18–24.
    1. Lipp MEN. O stress do professor. Campinas, SP: Papirus; 2002.
    1. Oliveira Filho A, Netto-Oliveira ER, Oliveira AAB. Quality of life and risk factors of university faculties. Rev. Educ. Fís/UEM. 2012; 23(1): 57–67.
    1. Gil-Monte PR. El syndrome de quemarse por el trabajo (“burnout”). Una enfermedad laboral en la sociedad del bienestar. Madrid: Pirámide; 2005.