Treatment of breast animation deformity: A systematic review
- PMID: 30902576
- DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2019.02.025
Treatment of breast animation deformity: A systematic review
Abstract
Introduction: Animation deformity (AD) is a known complication of subpectoral implant placement and results from the contraction of the pectoralis major muscle with resultant movement of the underlying implant. This can lead to a poor cosmetic result, with the implant becoming distinctly visible postbreast reconstruction and augmentation. The prevalence and clinical significance of AD remain unclear. To date, there exists no published review outlining the treatment modalities for AD and their effectiveness. The objective of this study is to appraise the effectiveness of various treatment options through a systematic review of the literature.
Methods: The MEDLINE search tool was used to carry out a search of the PubMed. Two separate reviewers independently assessed the initial resultant papers based on strict inclusion and exclusion criteria. Factors evaluated included patient demographics, publication information, study design, number of patients, preventative/treatment technique, and type and size of implant.
Results: The search strategy yielded 504 articles, of which eight articles met all the inclusion criteria. This represents 214 individual breasts that underwent surgical correction for AD. Of the 214 included breasts, 151 were postmastectomy and reconstruction, while 63 were primary augmentation. Of the reconstructed breasts, 5.6% (n = 12) received radiation. Overall, interventions for treating AD were successful in all (n = 214) of the documented cases, with an overall complication rate of 11.6% (n = 25) reported in the studies after treatment. The techniques used to treat AD included subfascial plane change (n = 8), prepectoral (subglandular/subcutaneous) plane change (n = 187), and muscle-splitting techniques (n = 19).
Conclusion: In conclusion, AD is likely an underestimated complication that is increasing in incidence with the growing number of breast implants being placed in the subpectoral plane. This review successfully identified the highly effective treatment modalities to combat AD. Patient characteristics and surgical technique must be tailored on a case-by-case basis to allow for optimum esthetic outcome given the substantial complication rate of these treatment modalities.
Keywords: Animation deformity; Breast animation; Breast augmentation; Breast complications; Muscle splitting; Prepectoral; Subpectoral implants.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Treatment of Breast Animation Deformity in Implant-Based Reconstruction with Selective Nerve Ablation.Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2018 Dec;42(6):1472-1475. doi: 10.1007/s00266-018-1184-0. Epub 2018 Jun 29. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2018. PMID: 29959495 Review.
-
Managing the animation deformity in breast reconstruction transposing the implant to a partial prepectoral pocket: Early experience and preliminary results with a new technique.J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2023 Nov;86:139-145. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2023.08.003. Epub 2023 Aug 19. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2023. PMID: 37716250
-
Complications Following Subpectoral Versus Prepectoral Breast Augmentation: A Meta-analysis.Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2019 Aug;43(4):890-898. doi: 10.1007/s00266-019-01404-7. Epub 2019 May 28. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2019. PMID: 31139912
-
The Relationship between Animation Deformity and Patient-Reported Outcomes: Application of the BREAST-Q to a Quantitative Stratification of Animation Severity.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020 Jan;145(1):11-17. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006314. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020. PMID: 31577656
-
Outcomes in Subfascial Versus Subglandular Planes in Breast Augmentation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Aesthet Surg J. 2024 Aug 20;44(9):NP639-NP644. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjae118. Aesthet Surg J. 2024. PMID: 38825810
Cited by
-
Rerouting of the pectoralis major muscle for breast animation deformity in sub-pectoral autologous breast reconstruction: A case report and review of the literature.Int J Surg Case Rep. 2020;77:28-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2020.10.044. Epub 2020 Oct 22. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2020. PMID: 33137667 Free PMC article.
-
Management of complications following implant-based breast reconstruction: a narrative review.Ann Transl Med. 2023 Dec 20;11(12):416. doi: 10.21037/atm-23-1384. Epub 2023 Jul 12. Ann Transl Med. 2023. PMID: 38213810 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Prepectoral implant pocket conversion in breast reconstruction.JPRAS Open. 2020 Sep 7;26:12-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jpra.2020.08.001. eCollection 2020 Dec. JPRAS Open. 2020. PMID: 32995458 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Literature review and guide for optimal position in implant-based breast reconstruction.Gland Surg. 2023 Aug 30;12(8):1082-1093. doi: 10.21037/gs-23-78. Epub 2023 Aug 21. Gland Surg. 2023. PMID: 37701292 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Advances in Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction.Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2023 Apr 18;19:361-368. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S404799. eCollection 2023. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2023. PMID: 37095832 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous