Mood outcomes of a behavioral treatment for urinary incontinence in prostate cancer survivors
- PMID: 30903368
- PMCID: PMC8100997
- DOI: 10.1007/s00520-019-04745-w
Mood outcomes of a behavioral treatment for urinary incontinence in prostate cancer survivors
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to assess whether prostate cancer survivors who received a behavioral intervention to urinary incontinence had experienced a significant mood improvement.
Methods: One hundred fifty-three prostate cancer survivors with persistent incontinence were included in this secondary data analysis. They were randomly assigned to usual care or interventions that provided pelvic floor muscle exercises and self-management skills. All subjects had measures of anxiety, depression, and anger at baseline, 3 months (post-intervention), and 6 months (follow-up). Negative binomial regression analysis was performed to examine the group status, daily leakage frequency at 3 months, and their interactions at 3 months as predictors for mood outcomes at 6 months, controlling for demographic and medical variables.
Results: The main effect of daily leakage frequency at 3 months significantly predicted anxiety at 6 months (p < .01). The group main effect on any mood outcomes at 6 months was not statistically significant. The interaction between the group and 3-month leakage had a significant effect on anxiety; intervention subjects achieving a significant leakage reduction at 3 months exhibited significantly less anxiety at 6 months than other subjects (p = .04). Age, employment status, and receiving surgery at baseline were significantly associated with less anxiety, depression, and anger at 6 months.
Conclusions: Reduced urinary incontinence significantly predicted less anxiety, especially among the intervention subjects. The findings suggest a significant association between a behavioral therapy of urinary incontinence and anxiety reduction in prostate cancer survivors.
Keywords: Anxiety; Behavioral intervention; Cancer care; Prostate cancer; Psychosocial studies.
Conflict of interest statement
References
-
- Kollberg KS, Wilderäng U, Thorsteinsdottir T, Hugosson J, Wiklund P, Bjartell A, Carlsson S, Stranne J, Haglind E, Steineck G (2017) How badly did it hit? Self-assessed emotional shock upon prostate cancer diagnosis and psychological well-being: a follow-up at 3, 12, and 24 months after surgery. Acta Oncol 56:984–990 - PubMed
-
- Lane A, Metcalfe C, Young GJ, Peters TJ, Blazeby J, Avery KN, Dedman D, Down L, Mason MD, Neal DE, Hamdy FC, Donovan JL, ProtecT Study group (2016) Patient-reported outcomes in the ProtecT randomized trial of clinically localized prostate cancer treatments: study design, and baseline urinary, bowel and sexual function and quality of life. BJU Int 118(6):869–879 - PMC - PubMed
-
- Sharp L, O’Leary E, Kinnear H, Gavin A, Drummond FJ (2016) Cancer-related symptoms predict psychological wellbeing among prostate cancer survivors: results from the PiCTure study. Psycho-Oncology 25:282–291 - PubMed
-
- Watson E, Shinkins B, Frith E, Neal D, Hamdy F, Walter F, Weller D, Wilkinson C, Faithfull S, Wolstenholme J, Sooriakumaran P, Kastner C, Campbell C, Neal R, Butcher H, Matthews M, Perera R, Rose P (2016) Symptoms, unmet needs, psychological wellbeing and health status in survivors of prostate cancer: implications for redesigning follow-up. BJU Int 117:E10–E19 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
