Traumatic renal injury in a UK major trauma centre - current management strategies and the role of early re-imaging
- PMID: 30903729
- DOI: 10.1111/bju.14752
Traumatic renal injury in a UK major trauma centre - current management strategies and the role of early re-imaging
Abstract
Objectives: To analyse the contemporary management of renal injuries in a UK major trauma centre and to evaluate the utility and value of re-imaging.
Patients and methods: The prospectively maintained 'Trauma Audit and Research Network' database was interrogated to identify patients with urinary tract injuries between January 2014 and December 2017. Patients' records and imaging were reviewed to identify injury grades, interventions, outcomes, and follow-up.
Results: Renal injury was identified in 90 patients (79 males and 11 females). The mean (sd; range) age was 35.5 (17.4; 1.5-94) years. Most of the renal traumas were caused by blunt mechanisms (74%). The overall severity of injuries was: 18 (20%) Grade I, 19 (21%) Grade II, 27 (30%) Grade III, 22 (24%) Grade IV, and four (4%) Grade V. Most patients (84%) were managed conservatively. Early intervention (<24 h) was performed in 14 patients (16%) for renal injuries. Most of these patients were managed by interventional radiology techniques (nine of 14). Only two patients required an emergency nephrectomy, both of whom died from extensive polytrauma. In all, 19 patients underwent laparotomy for other injuries and did not require renal exploration. The overall 30-day mortality was 13%. Re-imaging was performed in 66% of patients at an average time of 3.4 days from initial scan. The majority of re-imaging was planned (49 patients) and 12% of these scans demonstrated a relevant finding (urinoma, pseudoaneurysm) that altered management in three of the 49 patients (6.1%).
Conclusion: Non-operative management is the mainstay for all grades of injury. Haemodynamic instability and persistent urine leak are primary indications for intervention. Open surgical management is uncommon. Repeat imaging after injury is advocated for stable patients with high-grade renal injuries (Grade III-V), although more research is needed to determine the optimal timing.
Keywords: #UroTrauma; embolisation; kidney trauma; major trauma centre; re-imaging; renal injury.
© 2019 The Authors BJU International © 2019 BJU International Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
References
-
- Meng MV, Brandes SB, McAninch JW. Renal trauma: indications and techniques for surgical exploration. World J Urol 1999; 17: 71-7
-
- Moore EE, Shackford SR, Pachter HL et al. Organ injury scaling: spleen, liver, and kidney. J Trauma 1989; 29: 1664-6
-
- Schmidlin FR, Rohner S, Hadaya K et al. The conservative treatment of major kidney injuries. Ann Urol 1997; 31: 246-52
-
- Sujenthiran A, Elshout PJ, Veskimae E et al. Is nonoperative management the best first-line option for high-grade renal TRAUMA? A systematic review Eur Urol Focus 2017[Epub ahead of print]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2017.04.011.
-
- Shoobridge JJ, Bultitude MF, Koukounaras J, Martin KE, Royce PL, Corcoran NM. A 9-year experience of renal injury at an Australian level 1 trauma centre. BJU Int 2013; 112: 53-60
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources