Overall mean estimation of trace evidence in a two-level normal-normal model
- PMID: 30903935
- DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.01.047
Overall mean estimation of trace evidence in a two-level normal-normal model
Abstract
In the evaluation of measurements on characteristics of forensic trace evidence, Aitken and Lucy (2004) model the data as a two-level model using assumptions of normality where likelihood ratios are used as a measure for the strength of evidence. A two-level model assumes two sources of variation: the variation within measurements in a group (first level) and the variation between different groups (second level). Estimates of the variation within groups, the variation between groups and the overall mean are required in this approach. This paper discusses three estimators for the overall mean. In forensic science, two of these estimators are known as the weighted and unweighted mean. For an optimal choice between these estimators, the within- and between-group covariance matrices are required. In this paper a generalization to the latter two mean estimators is suggested, which is referred to as the generalized weighted mean. The weights of this estimator can be chosen such that they minimize the variance of the generalized weighted mean. These optimal weights lead to a "toy estimator", because they depend on the unknown within- and between-group covariance matrices. Using these optimal weights with estimates for the within- and between-group covariance matrices leads to the third estimator, the optimal "plug-in" generalized weighted mean estimator. The three estimators and the toy estimator are compared through a simulation study. Under conditions generally encountered in practice, we show that the unweighted mean can be preferred over the weighted mean. Moreover, in these situations the unweighted mean and the optimal generalized weighted mean behave similarly. An artificial choice of parameters is used to provide an example where the optimal generalized weighted mean outperforms both the weighted and unweighted mean. Finally, the three mean estimators are applied to real XTC data to illustrate the impact of the choice of overall mean estimator.
Keywords: Evidence evaluation; Likelihood ratio; Multivariate distributions; Overall mean estimation; XTC.
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier B.V.
Similar articles
-
Shrinkage estimators for covariance matrices.Biometrics. 2001 Dec;57(4):1173-84. doi: 10.1111/j.0006-341x.2001.01173.x. Biometrics. 2001. PMID: 11764258 Free PMC article.
-
A note on interval estimation of kappa in a series of 2 x 2 tables.Stat Med. 1999 Aug 15;18(15):2041-9. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19990815)18:15<2041::aid-sim167>3.0.co;2-b. Stat Med. 1999. PMID: 10440885
-
Variance estimators for weighted and stratified linear dose-response function estimators using generalized propensity score.Biom J. 2022 Jan;64(1):33-56. doi: 10.1002/bimj.202000267. Epub 2021 Jul 29. Biom J. 2022. PMID: 34327720
-
Interval estimation of risk ratio in the simple compliance randomized trial.Contemp Clin Trials. 2007 Feb;28(2):120-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2006.05.005. Epub 2006 Jul 3. Contemp Clin Trials. 2007. PMID: 16820329 Review.
-
Comparison of adjusted attributable risk estimators.Stat Med. 1992 Dec;11(16):2083-91. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780111606. Stat Med. 1992. PMID: 1293670 Review.
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources