Cost-effectiveness analysis of strategies to manage the disease burden of hepatitis C virus in Switzerland
- PMID: 30905063
- DOI: 10.4414/smw.2019.20026
Cost-effectiveness analysis of strategies to manage the disease burden of hepatitis C virus in Switzerland
Abstract
Background and aims: A previous analysis of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related healthcare costs in Switzerland found that the annual healthcare costs of untreated HCV infection (excluding antiviral treatment) could increase by more than 25 million Swiss francs (CHF) between 2013 and 2030. Since that publication, highly efficacious direct-acting antiviral therapies (DAAs) have become available, making HCV elimination a possibility. This analysis quantifies the clinical and economic burden of HCV intervention strategies over the next 15 years.
Methods: A model was developed to estimate the future clinical and economic burden of HCV infection if patients are diagnosed and treated according to a historical paradigm (historical base case), or at higher levels without treatment reimbursement restrictions (Scenario 1). The infected population was tracked by age- and sex-defined cohorts, and associated direct medical costs (healthcare, screening, diagnostics and treatment) and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were calculated. Direct cost savings and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) were calculated to assess the economic impact of each scenario. Additionally, we generated a net-zero cost scenario (Scenario 2), assuming the same treatment paradigm as Scenario 1 but at the treatment price that would break even by 2031.
Results: In the historical base case, annual direct costs are projected to decrease from 150 million (95% UI: 132–170 million) CHF in 2016 to 90 million (95% UI: 65–111 million) CHF in 2031. Cumulative direct costs are projected to reach 1.7 billion (95% UI: 1.2–2.0 billion) CHF by 2031. In Scenario 1, annual direct costs first increased to 175 million CHF by 2018, before declining to 44 million CHF by 2031. Cumulative direct costs in this scenario are projected to reach 1.8 billion CHF by 2031. For Scenario 2, the treatment price needed to achieve break-even by 2031 considering only direct costs would be 27,900 CHF per patient. By 2031, Scenarios 1 and 2 would gain 58,300 QALYs. In both scenarios, the ICER drops below the cost-effectiveness threshold of 78,000 CHF in 2018. Over the 15-year span, the ICER was determined to be 2,200 CHF for Scenario 1.
Conclusions: Increasing the number of patients treated and treating all fibrosis stages is cost-effective compared to the historical base case and could achieve break-even by 2031 at a price of 27,900 CHF.
Comment in
-
Controlling HCV in Switzerland: running against the clock.Swiss Med Wkly. 2019 Mar 24;149:w20005. doi: 10.4414/smw.2019.20005. eCollection 2019 Mar 11. Swiss Med Wkly. 2019. PMID: 30905058 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Economic evaluation of the hepatitis C elimination strategy in Greece in the era of affordable direct-acting antivirals.World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Mar 21;25(11):1327-1340. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i11.1327. World J Gastroenterol. 2019. PMID: 30918426 Free PMC article.
-
Modelling the Impact and Cost-effectiveness of Extended Hepatitis C Virus Screening and Treatment with Direct-acting Antivirals in a Swiss Custodial Setting.Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Nov 13;69(11):1980-1986. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz088. Clin Infect Dis. 2019. PMID: 30715266
-
Scenarios to manage the hepatitis C disease burden and associated economic impact of treatment in Turkey.Hepatol Int. 2017 Nov;11(6):509-516. doi: 10.1007/s12072-017-9820-3. Epub 2017 Oct 12. Hepatol Int. 2017. PMID: 29027109
-
Systematic review: economic evaluations of HCV screening in the direct-acting antivirals era.Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2019 May;49(9):1126-1133. doi: 10.1111/apt.15201. Epub 2019 Mar 6. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2019. PMID: 30843268
-
Cost-utility analysis of second-generation direct-acting antivirals for hepatitis C: a systematic review.Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Dec;12(12):1251-1263. doi: 10.1080/17474124.2018.1540929. Epub 2018 Oct 31. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018. PMID: 30791790
Cited by
-
Estimated number of people infected with hepatitis B and C virus in Germany in 2013: a baseline prevalence estimate using the workbook method.Front Public Health. 2025 Apr 7;13:1471256. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1471256. eCollection 2025. Front Public Health. 2025. PMID: 40260160 Free PMC article.
-
Modelling the microelimination of chronic hepatitis C in the canton of Bern, Switzerland: Reaching the Swiss Hepatitis Strategy goals despite the impact of the COVID 19 pandemic.PLoS One. 2022 Aug 12;17(8):e0272518. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272518. eCollection 2022. PLoS One. 2022. PMID: 35960770 Free PMC article.
-
How to set the agenda for hepatitis C: a theory-driven policy analysis.Health Res Policy Syst. 2022 Feb 14;20(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12961-022-00824-3. Health Res Policy Syst. 2022. PMID: 35164777 Free PMC article.
-
Cost Effectiveness of Screening for Hepatitis C Virus in Iraq in the Era of Simplified Testing and Treatment.Pharmacoeconomics. 2021 Nov;39(11):1327-1341. doi: 10.1007/s40273-021-01064-z. Epub 2021 Aug 16. Pharmacoeconomics. 2021. PMID: 34396494 Free PMC article.
-
Hepatitis C virus: A critical approach to who really needs treatment.World J Hepatol. 2022 Jan 27;14(1):1-44. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v14.i1.1. World J Hepatol. 2022. PMID: 35126838 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources