Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Mar 15:8:F1000 Faculty Rev-295.
doi: 10.12688/f1000research.15866.1. eCollection 2019.

Recent advances in urologic surgical techniques for pyeloplasty

Affiliations
Review

Recent advances in urologic surgical techniques for pyeloplasty

Mikolaj Mendrek et al. F1000Res. .

Abstract

Pyeloplasty is one of the most common urological reconstructive interventions. Since the presentation of the first open pyeloplasty by Anderson and Hynes in 1949, the management of ureteropelvic junction obstruction has dramatically developed. The most immense progress was made in the 1990s with the introduction of laparoscopy. A multitude of new minimal surgical techniques have been introduced since then. In the last few years, the innovations were based on refinement of already-existing techniques and technology. With this aim, single-port surgery, three-dimensional vision for laparoscopy, robotic technology, and alternative techniques for creating the anastomosis-like fibrin glue have been introduced. This unsystematic review is timely, and the scientific interest is to present and discuss some of the latest advances in surgical techniques and different approaches for the intra- and post-operative management in pyeloplasty. To the best of our knowledge, this is the only review looking at the recent advances in urological surgical techniques for pyeloplasty during the last few years with a focus on new technology and surgical techniques.

Keywords: laparoscopy; pyeloplasty; surgical techniques; ureteropelvic junction obstruction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No competing interests were disclosed.No competing interests were disclosed.No competing interests were disclosed.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Tan BJ, Smith AD: Ureteropelvic junction obstruction repair: when, how, what? Curr Opin Urol. 2004;14(2):55–9. 10.1097/00042307-200403000-00002 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Khawaja AR, Dar TI, Bashir F, et al. : Stentless laparoscopic pyeloplasty: A single center experience. Urol Ann. 2014;6(3):202–7. 10.4103/0974-7796.134258 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anderson JC, Hynes W: Retrocaval ureter; a case diagnosed pre-operatively and treated successfully by a plastic operation. Br J Urol. 1949;21(3):209–14. 10.1111/j.1464-410X.1949.tb10773.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rogers A, Hasan T: Management of secondary pelviureteric junction obstruction. Indian J Urol. 2013;29(4):294–302. 10.4103/0970-1591.120110 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. O'Reilly PH, Brooman PJ, Mak S, et al. : The long-term results of Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty. BJU Int. 2001;87(4):287–9. 10.1046/j.1464-410x.2001.00108.x - DOI - PubMed