Mapping of Paediatric Cochlear Implant Using Neural Response Threshold (NRT) and Behavioural Observation Audiometry (BOA)
- PMID: 30906712
- PMCID: PMC6401049
- DOI: 10.1007/s12070-018-1524-z
Mapping of Paediatric Cochlear Implant Using Neural Response Threshold (NRT) and Behavioural Observation Audiometry (BOA)
Abstract
To measure the correlation between neural response threshold (NRT) and most comfortable level for behavioural response (MCLB) whichever is better for rehabilitation purpose and to calculate the impedance of the electrode in cochlear implant recipient. Mapping may be done by various methods here we did by NRT and behavioral observation audiometry (BOA). NRT is technique by which we measure the response from the auditory nerve using the hi-resolution bionic ear system. Neural response measurement depends on the-neural tissue, stimulus used and recording technique. BOA is used for observing motor response on presenting sound to the implanted child. Most comfortable level for behavioural response (MCLB) is calculated for behavioural response. It measures the useful information about low frequency hearing, it provides more information about the hearing of neurologically immature babies giving indication of uncomfortable loudness levels. The NRT and MCLB is calculated for 2nd, 6th, and 11th electrode for all patients in our study. Auditory response threshold is better for rehabilitations then behavioural observation audiometry for Cochlear implant patients. Mean value and standard deviation of neural response threshold (NRT) (qu) are 10.23, 3.67; 11.27, 4.39; 10.71, 3.88 at 2nd, 6th, and 11th electrode respectively. Mean value and standard deviation of Most comfortable level for behavioral response (qu) are 20.49, 7.08; 21.26, 7.31; 21.01, 6.03 at 2nd, 6th and 11th electrode respectively. NRT is better for post-operative rehabilitations and MCL and threshold vary with different electrode and in different patients.
Keywords: Behavioural observation audiometry; Cochlear Implant; Impedance; Most comfortable level for behavioural response; Neural response threshold.
Figures









Similar articles
-
Efficacy of using NRT thresholds in cochlear implants fitting, in prelingual pediatric patients.J Otol. 2019 Dec;14(4):128-135. doi: 10.1016/j.joto.2019.06.002. Epub 2019 Jun 28. J Otol. 2019. PMID: 32742272 Free PMC article.
-
[The value of threshold of neural response telemetry on the prediction of behavioral audiometry threshold after cochlear implantation patients].Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2022 Dec;36(12):921-924. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2022.12.006. Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2022. PMID: 36543399 Free PMC article. Chinese.
-
Comparison of Intraoperative Neural Response Telemetry Results and Postoperative Neural Response Telemetry Results in Case of Children with Congenital Bilateral Severe to Profound Sensorineural Hearing Loss Undergoing Single Sided Cochlear Implantation.Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023 Apr;75(Suppl 1):336-342. doi: 10.1007/s12070-022-03284-x. Epub 2023 Jan 9. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023. PMID: 37206791 Free PMC article.
-
Correlation between NRT measurement level and behavioral levels in pediatrics cochlear implant patients.Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2010 Apr;74(4):356-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2009.12.017. Epub 2010 Jan 13. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2010. PMID: 20074818
-
A different approach to using neural response telemetry for automated cochlear implant processor programming.Ear Hear. 2005 Aug;26(4 Suppl):38S-44S. doi: 10.1097/00003446-200508001-00006. Ear Hear. 2005. PMID: 16082266 Review.
References
-
- Mittal R, Panwar SS, Nair S, Sinha VR, Ramesh AV, Nilkanthan A, Raj P. Mapping of pediatric cochlear implant recipients using electrical auditory brainstem responses as a tool. Int Otol. 2015;21:14–18. doi: 10.4103/0971-7749.152852. - DOI
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources