Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Mar 25;21(3):e11922.
doi: 10.2196/11922.

Sustainable Adoption of Digital Health Innovations: Perspectives From a Stakeholder Workshop

Affiliations

Sustainable Adoption of Digital Health Innovations: Perspectives From a Stakeholder Workshop

Michelle Helena Van Velthoven et al. J Med Internet Res. .

Abstract

Background: There are various complex reasons that influence sustainable adoption of innovations in health care systems. Low adoption can be caused by a lack of support from one or more stakeholders because their needs and expectations are not always considered or aligned.

Objective: This study aimed to identify stakeholders' perceptions of barriers and facilitators toward the sustainable adoption of digital health innovations.

Methods: A stakeholder workshop was attended by 12 participants with a range of backgrounds on August 25, 2017, including people representing the views from patients, carers, local hospitals, pharmacy retailers, health insurers, health services researchers, engineers, and technology and pharmaceutical companies in Switzerland. On the basis of adoption of innovation frameworks, we asked participants to interview each other about 3 factors influencing the adoption of digitally delivered health interventions: (1) Facilitators and barriers in the external system, (2) Needs and expectations of stakeholders, and (3) Safety, quality, and usability of innovations. The worksheets and videos generated from the workshop were qualitatively analyzed and summarized.

Results: Facilitators for adoption mentioned were high levels of income and education, and digital health is a high priority to stakeholders. Main common interests of different stakeholders were patient satisfaction and job protection. Health care spending was a misaligned interest: although some stakeholders were keen on spending more to obtain or provide the highest quality of care, others were focused on reducing health care spending to provide cost-effective services. Switzerland's diversity and complexity, in terms of its organization with 26 cantons (administrative divisions), were barriers as these made it harder to ensure interoperability of interventions. A culture of innovation was considered a push factor, but adoption was inhibited by persistent paper-based systems, a fear of change, and unwillingness to share data. The sustainability of interventions can be promoted by making them patient-centered, meaning that patients should be involved throughout their development.

Conclusions: Promoting sustainable adoption of digital health remains challenging despite various push factors being in place. Barriers related to fragmentation, patient-centeredness, data security, privacy, trust, and job security need to be addressed. A strength is that people from a wide range of backgrounds attended the workshop. A limitation is that the findings are focused on the macro level. In-depth case studies of specific issues need to be conducted in different settings.

Keywords: adoption; digital health; stakeholders; telemedicine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

References

    1. Pearl R. Kaiser Permanente Northern California: current experiences with internet, mobile, and video technologies. Health Aff (Millwood) 2014 Feb;33(2):251–7. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2013.1005.33/2/251 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lennon MR, Bouamrane M, Devlin AM, O'Connor S, O'Donnell C, Chetty U, Agbakoba R, Bikker A, Grieve E, Finch T, Watson N, Wyke S, Mair FS. Readiness for delivering digital health at scale: lessons from a longitudinal qualitative evaluation of a national digital health innovation program in the United Kingdom. J Med Internet Res. 2017 Feb 16;19(2):e42. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6900. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Muoio D. MobiHealthNews. [2019-02-05]. Digital health funding in Q1 2018 https://www.mobihealthnews.com/content/digital-health-funding-q1-2018 .
    1. Brant H, Atherton H, Ziebland S, McKinstry B, Campbell JL, Salisbury C. Using alternatives to face-to-face consultations: a survey of prevalence and attitudes in general practice. Br J Gen Pract. 2016 Jul;66(648):e460–6. doi: 10.3399/bjgp16X685597. http://bjgp.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=27215571 bjgp16X685597 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Greenhalgh T, Shaw S, Wherton J, Vijayaraghavan S, Morris J, Bhattacharya S, Hanson P, Campbell-Richards D, Ramoutar S, Collard A, Hodkinson I. Real-world implementation of video outpatient consultations at macro, meso, and micro levels: mixed-method study. J Med Internet Res. 2018 Dec 17;20(4):e150. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9897. http://www.jmir.org/2018/4/e150/ - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types