Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 May 1;173(5):455-461.
doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.0241.

Racial Segregation and Inequality in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit for Very Low-Birth-Weight and Very Preterm Infants

Jeffrey D Horbar  1   2 , Erika M Edwards  1   2   3 , Lucy T Greenberg  1 , Jochen Profit  4   5 , David Draper  6 , Daniel Helkey  6 , Scott A Lorch  7   8 , Henry C Lee  4   5 , Ciaran S Phibbs  4   9 , Jeannette Rogowski  10 , Jeffrey B Gould  4   5 , Glenn Firebaugh  11
Affiliations

Racial Segregation and Inequality in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit for Very Low-Birth-Weight and Very Preterm Infants

Jeffrey D Horbar et al. JAMA Pediatr. .

Abstract

Importance: Racial and ethnic minorities receive lower-quality health care than white non-Hispanic individuals in the United States. Where minority infants receive care and the role that may play in the quality of care received is unclear.

Objective: To determine the extent of segregation and inequality of care of very low-birth-weight and very preterm infants across neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) in the United States.

Design, setting, and participants: This cohort study of 743 NICUs in the Vermont Oxford Network included 117 982 black, Hispanic, Asian, and white infants born at 401 g to 1500 g or 22 to 29 weeks' gestation from January 2014 to December 2016. Analysis began January 2018.

Main outcomes and measures: The NICU segregation index and NICU inequality index were calculated at the hospital level as the Gini coefficients associated with the Lorenz curves for black, Hispanic, and Asian infants compared with white infants, with NICUs ranked by proportion of white infants for the NICU segregation index and by composite Baby-MONITOR (Measure of Neonatal Intensive Care Outcomes Research) score for the NICU inequality index.

Results: Infants (36 359 black [31%], 21 808 Hispanic [18%], 5920 Asian [5%], and 53 895 white [46%]) were segregated among the 743 NICUs by race and ethnicity (NICU segregation index: black: 0.50 [95% CI, 0.46-0.53], Hispanic: 0.58 [95% CI, 0.54-0.61], and Asian: 0.45 [95% CI, 0.40-0.50]). Compared with white infants, black infants were concentrated at NICUs with lower-quality scores, and Hispanic and Asian infants were concentrated at NICUs with higher-quality scores (NICU inequality index: black: 0.07 [95% CI, 0.02-0.13], Hispanic: -0.10 [95% CI, -0.17 to -0.04], and Asian: -0.26 [95% CI, -0.32 to -0.19]). There was marked variation among the census regions in weighted mean NICU quality scores (range: -0.69 to 0.85). Region of residence explained the observed inequality for Hispanic infants but not for black or Asian infants.

Conclusions and relevance: Black, Hispanic, and Asian infants were segregated across NICUs, reflecting the racial segregation of minority populations in the United States. There were large differences between geographic regions in NICU quality. After accounting for these differences, compared with white infants, Asian infants received care at higher-quality NICUs and black infants, at lower-quality NICUs. Explaining these patterns will require understanding the effects of sociodemographic factors and public policies on hospital quality, access, and choice for minority women and their infants.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Horbar and Ms Greenberg are employees of Vermont Oxford Network. Dr Edwards receives salary support from Vermont Oxford Network. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Lorenz Curves for Segregation by Race/Ethnicity in US Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICUs)
Hospitals were ranked by the proportion of white infants from highest to lowest, and the cumulative population percentages of white and minority infants were plotted on the x- and y-axes. If all NICUs had the same racial distribution as the overall population, the curves would fall on the 45° diagonal line. The light blue line (left) represents Asian infants. The dark blue line (middle) represents black infants. The orange line (right) represents Hispanic infants.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Lorenz Curves for Inequality of Care by Race/Ethnicity in US Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICUs)
Hospitals were ranked by their Baby-MONITOR (Measure of Neonatal Intensive Care Outcomes Research) scores, and the cumulative population percentages of white and minority infants were plotted on the x- and y-axes. If all racial/ethnic groups had the same quality distribution as the overall population, the curves would fall on the 45° diagonal line. The light blue line (left) represents Asian infants. The orange line (middle) represents Hispanic infants. The dark blue line (right) represents black infants.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. Massey DS, Denton NA. American Apartheid: Segregation and Making of the Underclass. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1998.
    1. Firebaugh G, Acciai F. For blacks in America, the gap in neighborhood poverty has declined faster than segregation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113(47):13372-13377. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1607220113 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Firebaugh G, Farrell CR. Still large, but narrowing: the sizable decline in racial neighborhood inequality in metropolitan America, 1980-2010. Demography. 2016;53(1):139-164. doi: 10.1007/s13524-015-0447-5 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kozol J. Savage Inequalities: Children in America’s Schools. New York, NY: Broadway Paperbacks; 1991.
    1. Rivkin S. Desegregation since the Coleman Report. Educ Next. 2016;16(2):28-37.

Publication types