Wireless High-Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation (10 kHz) Compared with Multiwaveform Low-Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation in the Management of Chronic Pain in Failed Back Surgery Syndrome Subjects: Preliminary Results of a Multicenter, Prospective Randomized Controlled Study
- PMID: 30908577
- DOI: 10.1093/pm/pnz019
Wireless High-Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation (10 kHz) Compared with Multiwaveform Low-Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation in the Management of Chronic Pain in Failed Back Surgery Syndrome Subjects: Preliminary Results of a Multicenter, Prospective Randomized Controlled Study
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to evaluate the wireless Freedom Spinal Cord Stimulator (WSCS) System for the treatment of chronic back and/or leg pain associated with failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) refractory to standard medical treatment utilizing 10-kHz stimulation (high-frequency [HF]) in comparison with 10-1,500-Hz stimulation (low-frequency [LF]) waveforms.
Methods: Ninety-nine subjects were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either HF or LF stimulation waveforms utilizing the same Freedom WSCS System. All subjects were implanted with two 8-electrode arrays in the exact same anatomical positions within the dorsal epidural spinal column, with the top electrode positioned at the T8 and T9 vertebrae levels, respectively, and the wireless receiver placed under the skin in a subcutaneous pocket.
Results: Seventy-two (HF: N = 38; LF: N = 34) subjects had completed the six-month follow-up after an initial 30-day trial period at the time of this report. For both the HF and LF arms, mean visual analog scale (VAS) scores for back and leg pain decreased significantly: 77% and 76%, respectively, for the HF arm and 64% and 64%, respectively, for the LF arm. In addition, most subjects experienced significant improvements in VAS, Oswestry Disability Index, European Quality of Life 5 Dimension questionnaire, Patient Global Impression of Change, and sleep duration.
Conclusions: These preliminary results demonstrate that WSCS devices can reduce FBSS chronic pain substantially with both LF and HF stimulation waveforms over a seven-month period (30-day trial period and six-month post-trial evaluation).
Keywords: Chronic Back Pain; Failed Back Surgery Syndrome; High Frequency; Spinal Cord stimulation; Wireless.
2019 American Academy of Pain Medicine.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of conventional, burst and high-frequency spinal cord stimulation on pain relief in refractory failed back surgery syndrome patients: study protocol for a prospective randomized double-blinded cross-over trial (MULTIWAVE study).Trials. 2020 Aug 3;21(1):696. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04587-6. Trials. 2020. PMID: 32746899 Free PMC article.
-
Multi-waveform Spinal Cord Stimulation with High Frequency Electromagnetic Coupled (HF-EMC) Powered Implanted Electrode Array and Receiver for the Treatment of Chronic Back and Leg Pain (SURF Study).Pain Physician. 2022 Jan;25(1):67-76. Pain Physician. 2022. PMID: 35051146
-
Multicolumn spinal cord stimulation for significant low back pain in failed back surgery syndrome: design of a national, multicentre, randomized, controlled health economics trial (ESTIMET Study).Neurochirurgie. 2015 Mar;61 Suppl 1:S109-16. doi: 10.1016/j.neuchi.2014.10.105. Epub 2014 Nov 20. Neurochirurgie. 2015. PMID: 25456442 Clinical Trial.
-
Waves of Pain Relief: A Systematic Review of Clinical Trials in Spinal Cord Stimulation Waveforms for the Treatment of Chronic Neuropathic Low Back and Leg Pain.World Neurosurg. 2019 Nov;131:264-274.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.07.167. Epub 2019 Jul 30. World Neurosurg. 2019. PMID: 31369885
-
Treatment Options for Failed Back Surgery Syndrome Patients With Refractory Chronic Pain: An Evidence Based Approach.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017 Jul 15;42 Suppl 14:S41-S52. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002217. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017. PMID: 28505029 Review.
Cited by
-
Wireless High-Frequency Peripheral Nerve Stimulation for Chronic Refractory Knee Pain Post-total Knee Replacement.Cureus. 2023 Mar 4;15(3):e35759. doi: 10.7759/cureus.35759. eCollection 2023 Mar. Cureus. 2023. PMID: 37025751 Free PMC article.
-
Spinal Cord Stimulation vs Medical Management for Chronic Back and Leg Pain: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Nov 4;7(11):e2444608. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.44608. JAMA Netw Open. 2024. PMID: 39541119 Free PMC article.
-
Implantable Pulse Generators for Deep Brain Stimulation: Challenges, Complications, and Strategies for Practicality and Longevity.Front Hum Neurosci. 2021 Aug 26;15:708481. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.708481. eCollection 2021. Front Hum Neurosci. 2021. PMID: 34512295 Free PMC article.
-
The Added Value of Subcutaneous Peripheral Nerve Field Stimulation Combined with SCS, as Salvage Therapy, for Refractory Low Back Pain Component in Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome Implanted Patients: A Randomized Controlled Study (CUMPNS Study) Based on 3D-Mapping Composite Pain Assessment.J Clin Med. 2021 Oct 29;10(21):5094. doi: 10.3390/jcm10215094. J Clin Med. 2021. PMID: 34768614 Free PMC article.
-
Treatment modalities for patients with Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome Type II: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.Commun Med (Lond). 2025 Mar 5;5(1):63. doi: 10.1038/s43856-025-00778-x. Commun Med (Lond). 2025. PMID: 40044846 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous