Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Mar 22;9(3):108.
doi: 10.3390/ani9030108.

Review of Sensor Technologies in Animal Breeding: Phenotyping Behaviors of Laying Hens to Select Against Feather Pecking

Affiliations
Review

Review of Sensor Technologies in Animal Breeding: Phenotyping Behaviors of Laying Hens to Select Against Feather Pecking

Esther D Ellen et al. Animals (Basel). .

Abstract

Damaging behaviors, like feather pecking (FP), have large economic and welfare consequences in the commercial laying hen industry. Selective breeding can be used to obtain animals that are less likely to perform damaging behavior on their pen-mates. However, with the growing tendency to keep birds in large groups, identifying specific birds that are performing or receiving FP is difficult. With current developments in sensor technologies, it may now be possible to identify laying hens in large groups that show less FP behavior and select them for breeding. We propose using a combination of sensor technology and genomic methods to identify feather peckers and victims in groups. In this review, we will describe the use of "-omics" approaches to understand FP and give an overview of sensor technologies that can be used for animal monitoring, such as ultra-wideband, radio frequency identification, and computer vision. We will then discuss the identification of indicator traits from both sensor technologies and genomics approaches that can be used to select animals for breeding against damaging behavior.

Keywords: -omics; computer vision; damaging behavior; genetic selection; identification; measuring behavior; radio frequency identification; ultra-wideband.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Overview of different radio frequency identification (RFID) systems and their main characteristics (based on [51,52,54,57,58]) 1. Microwave frequencies are excluded here, as these are not commonly used for animal tracking. LF: low frequency; HF: high frequency; UHF: ultra-high frequency; UWB: ultra-high frequency.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Tracking an individual laying hen using ultra-wideband (UWB) tracking (left panel) and video tracking (right panel).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Big data in livestock production.

References

    1. Savory C.J. Feather pecking and cannibalism. World Poult. Sci. J. 1995;51:215–219. doi: 10.1079/WPS19950016. - DOI
    1. Blokhuis H.J., Wiepkema P.R. Studies of feather pecking in poultry. Vet. Q. 1998;20:6–9. doi: 10.1080/01652176.1998.9694825. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rodenburg T.B., Van Krimpen M.M., De Jong I.C., De Haas E.N., Kops M.S., Riedstra B.J., Nordquist R.E., Wagenaar J.P., Bestman M., Nicol C.J. The prevention and control of feather pecking in laying hens: Identifying the underlying principles. World Poult. Sci. J. 2013;69:361–374. doi: 10.1017/S0043933913000354. - DOI
    1. Kjaer J.B., Sorensen P., Su G. Divergent selection on feather pecking behaviour in laying hens (gallus gallus domesticus) Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2001;71:229–239. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(00)00184-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Muir W.M. Group selection for adaptation to multiple-hen cages: Selection program and direct responses. Poult. Sci. 1996;75:447–458. doi: 10.3382/ps.0750447. - DOI - PubMed