Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Jun;90(6):478-486.
doi: 10.1007/s00104-019-0945-x.

[Transanal total mesorectal excision-a critical appraisal]

[Article in German]
C Holmer  1 , S Benz  2 , S Fichtner-Feigl  3 , E C Jehle  4 , P Kienle  5 , S Post  6 , T Schiedeck  7 , J Weitz  8 , M E Kreis  9
Affiliations
Review

[Transanal total mesorectal excision-a critical appraisal]

[Article in German]
C Holmer et al. Chirurg. 2019 Jun.

Abstract

Introduction: Total mesorectal excision (TME) is the international standard for rectal cancer surgery. In addition to laparoscopic TME (lapTME), transanal TME (taTME) was developed in recent years to reduce the rate of incomplete TME, conversion to open surgery and postoperative functional impairment. Despite limited evidence, this technique is becoming increasingly more popular and is already routinely used by many hospitals for rectal cancer in varying tumor level locations. The aim of this review was to evaluate the taTME compared to anterior rectal resection with lapTME as the standard of care in rectal cancer surgery based on currently available evidence.

Method: The databases PubMed and Medline were systematically searched for publications on transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) and transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS). Relevant studies were selected and further research based on the reference lists was undertaken.

Results: A total of 16 studies analyzing 3782 patients were identified. The taTME does not lead to a higher rate of complete TME-resected specimens compared to the standard procedure. So far, superiority could not be demonstrated for complication rates or for functional or oncological results. Serious complications secondary to dissection in incorrect planes were observed. The anastomotic level generally seems to be closer to the sphincter after taTME versus anterior lapTME.

Conclusion: Considering current evidence, taTME failed to show superiority compared to conventional anterior lapTME. Although taTME has some potential advantages, it carries substantial risks. If performed outside of clinical trials, it should therefore only be used in carefully selected patients with a high possibility of conversion, following adequate patient informed consent and after intense and systematic training of the surgeon.

Keywords: Rectal cancer; Rectal resection; Transanal minimally invasive surgery; Transanal surgery; Transanal total mesorectal excision.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Ann Surg. 2009 Jan;249(1):82-6 - PubMed
    1. Ann Surg. 2010 Feb;251(2):249-53 - PubMed
    1. Surg Endosc. 2010 May;24(5):1205-10 - PubMed
    1. Surg Endosc. 2013 Jan;27(1):74-80 - PubMed
    1. Br J Surg. 2013 Jan;100(1):75-82 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources