Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Mar 26;20(3):855-861.
doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2019.20.3.855.

The Prefectural Participation Rates of Lung Cancer Screening Had a Negative Correlation with the Lung Cancer Mortality Rates

Affiliations

The Prefectural Participation Rates of Lung Cancer Screening Had a Negative Correlation with the Lung Cancer Mortality Rates

Motoyasu Sagawa et al. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. .

Abstract

Background: The participation rate is one of the most important indexes in the cancer screening. Historically in Japan, each local government has developed their own equations to calculate the subjects for population-based screening, which were different from each other, and therefore the participation rates of screening were not comparable. Recently, local governments were ordered to use the standardized equation in reporting data, which made it possible to compare the participation rates of cancer screening nationwide for the first time. We therefore investigated the correlation between the prefectural lung cancer mortality and several indicators of lung cancer screening. Methods: The prefectural participation rates of lung, gastric and colonic cancer screening, test positive rates, attendance rates for further examination, lung cancer detection rates and positive predictive values of lung cancer screening were collected from “Cancer Registration and Statistics” of the National Cancer Research Center website. The age-adjusted lung, gastric and colonic cancer mortality rates, smoking rates were also collected. The EZR software program was used for statistical analyses. Results: The participation rates of lung cancer screening had a strong positive correlation with the participation rates of gastric/colonic cancer screening (P<0.001). The prefectural lung cancer mortality rates had a moderate to weak negative correlation with the participation rates of lung cancer screening (P=0.009). A little correlation was noted between other quality assurance indicators of lung cancer screening and lung cancer mortality rates. Conclusion: These results suggested that participating in lung cancer screening might help reduce lung cancer mortality rates in some extent.

Keywords: lung cancer; cancer screening; mortality; ecological study; correlation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The Correlation (in Total: Males and Females) between the Participation Rates of Lung Cancer Screening and Other Factors. A, the Participation Rates of Gastric Cancer Screening; B, the Participation Rates of Colonic Cancer Screening; C, the Attendance Rates for Further Examination of Lung Cancer Screening; D, the Smoking Rates.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The Correlation between the Participation Rates of Lung Cancer Screening and the Lung Cancer Mortality Rates (A); the Gastric Cancer Mortality Rates (B); and the Colonic Cancer Mortality Rates (C); The Correlation between the Lung Cancer Mortality Rates and the Smoking Rates (D).
Figure 3
Figure 3
The Correlation between the Lung Cancer Mortality Rates and the Test Positive Rates (A); the attendance rates for further examination (B); lung cancer detection rates (C); and the positive predictive values of lung cancer screening (D).

References

    1. Cramer DW. The role of cervical cytology in the declining morbidity and mortality of cervical cancer. Cancer. 1974;34:2018–27. - PubMed
    1. Diniz CSG, Pellini ACG, Ribeiro AG, et al. Breast cancer mortality and associated factors in São Paulo State, Brazil: an ecological analysis. BMJ Open. 2017;7:e016395. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ferlay J, Steliarova-Foucher E, Lortet-Tieulent J, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: estimates for 40 countries in 2012. Eur J Cancer. 2013;49:1374–403. - PubMed
    1. Harding C, Pompei F, Burmistrov D, et al. Breast cancer screening, incidence, and mortality across US counties. JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175:1483–9. - PubMed
    1. Kanda Y. Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software ‘EZR'for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2013;48:452–8. - PMC - PubMed