Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Mar 26;321(12):1200-1210.
doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.1696.

In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Review

Affiliations
Review

In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Review

Lars W Andersen et al. JAMA. .

Abstract

Importance: In-hospital cardiac arrest is common and associated with a high mortality rate. Despite this, in-hospital cardiac arrest has received little attention compared with other high-risk cardiovascular conditions, such as stroke, myocardial infarction, and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

Observations: In-hospital cardiac arrest occurs in over 290 000 adults each year in the United States. Cohort data from the United States indicate that the mean age of patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest is 66 years, 58% are men, and the presenting rhythm is most often (81%) nonshockable (ie, asystole or pulseless electrical activity). The cause of the cardiac arrest is most often cardiac (50%-60%), followed by respiratory insufficiency (15%-40%). Efforts to prevent in-hospital cardiac arrest require both a system for identifying deteriorating patients and an appropriate interventional response (eg, rapid response teams). The key elements of treatment during cardiac arrest include chest compressions, ventilation, early defibrillation, when applicable, and immediate attention to potentially reversible causes, such as hyperkalemia or hypoxia. There is limited evidence to support more advanced treatments. Post-cardiac arrest care is focused on identification and treatment of the underlying cause, hemodynamic and respiratory support, and potentially employing neuroprotective strategies (eg, targeted temperature management). Although multiple individual factors are associated with outcomes (eg, age, initial rhythm, duration of the cardiac arrest), a multifaceted approach considering both potential for neurological recovery and ongoing multiorgan failure is warranted for prognostication and clinical decision-making in the post-cardiac arrest period. Withdrawal of care in the absence of definite prognostic signs both during and after cardiac arrest should be avoided. Hospitals are encouraged to participate in national quality-improvement initiatives.

Conclusions and relevance: An estimated 290 000 in-hospital cardiac arrests occur each year in the United States. However, there is limited evidence to support clinical decision making. An increased awareness with regard to optimizing clinical care and new research might improve outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Survival After In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest, 2000 to 2017
Based on data from the Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation registry on all adult in-hospital cardiac arrests from 2000 to 2017 The dotted lines represent 95% CIs. Shockable rhythms include ventricular fibrillation and pulseless ventricular tachycardia. Nonshockable rhythms include asystole and pulseless electrical activity. Adapted from Benjamin et al.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. The Cardiac Arrest Survival Postresuscitation In-hospital (CASPRI) Score
Reprinted from Chan et al, where a detailed description of the score's interpretation is presented. Scores of 0-4 are associated with 83% survival, 15-19 are associated with 23% survival, and 30-34 are associated with 2% survival. CPC indicates cerebral performance score; VF/VT, ventricular fibrillation or ventricular tachycardia.

References

    1. Girotra S, Nallamothu BK, Spertus JA, Li Y, Krumholz HM, Chan PS; American Heart Association Get with the Guidelines–Resuscitation Investigators. Trends in survival after in-hospital cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(20):1912–1920. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1109148 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Benjamin EJ, Virani SS, Callaway CW, et al.; American Heart Association Council on Epidemiology and Prevention Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2018 Update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2018;137(12):e67–e492. doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000000558 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sinha SS, Sukul D, Lazarus JJ, et al. Identifying important gaps in randomized controlled trials of adult cardiac arrest treatments: a systematic review of the published literature. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2016;9(6):749–756. doi:10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.116.002916 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Neumar RW, Shuster M, Callaway CW, et al. Part 1: Executive Summary: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation. 2015;132(18)(suppl 2):S315–S367. doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000000252 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Monsieurs KG, Nolan JP, Bossaert LL, et al.; ERC Guidelines 2015 Writing Group. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2015: Section 1. Executive summary. Resuscitation. 2015;95:1–80. doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.07.038 - DOI - PubMed