Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Feb 25;3(3):e10187.
doi: 10.1002/jbm4.10187. eCollection 2019 Mar.

Cancer- and Chemotherapy-Induced Musculoskeletal Degradation

Affiliations
Review

Cancer- and Chemotherapy-Induced Musculoskeletal Degradation

Kathleen M Sturgeon et al. JBMR Plus. .

Abstract

Mobility in advanced cancer patients is a major health care concern and is often lost in advanced metastatic cancers. Erosion of mobility is a major component in determining quality of life but also starts a process of loss of muscle and bone mass that further devastates patients. In addition, treatment options become limited in these advanced cancer patients. Loss of bone and muscle occurs concomitantly. Advanced cancers that are metastatic to bone often lead to bone loss (osteolytic lesions) but may also lead to abnormal deposition of new bone (osteoblastic lesions). However, in both cases there is a disruption to normal bone remodeling and radiologic evidence of bone loss. Many antitumor therapies can also lead to loss of bone in cancer survivors. Bone loss releases cytokines (TGFβ) stored in the mineralized matrix that can act on skeletal muscle and lead to weakness. Likewise, loss of skeletal muscle mass leads to reduced bone mass and quality via mechanical and endocrine signals. Collectively these interactions are termed bone-muscle cross-talk, which has garnered much attention recently as a prime target for musculoskeletal health. Pharmacological approaches as well as nutrition and exercise can improve muscle and bone but have fallen short in the context of advanced cancers and cachexia. This review highlights our current knowledge of these interventions and discusses the difficulties in treating severe musculoskeletal deficits with the emphasis on improving not only bone mass and muscle size but also functional outcomes. © 2019 The Authors. JBMR Plus published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Keywords: BONE‐MUSCLE INTERACTIONS; CANCER; CHEMOTHERAPY; TUMOR‐INDUCED BONE DISEASE.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic showing the therapeutic options for loss of bone and muscle throughout the cancer continuum.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Fang J, Xu Q. Differences of osteoblastic bone metastases and osteolytic bone metastases in clinical features and molecular characteristics. Clin Transl Oncol. 2015;17:173–9. - PubMed
    1. Liede A, Jerzak KJ, Hernandez RK, Wade SW, Sun P, Narod SA. The incidence of bone metastasis after early‐stage breast cancer in Canada. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016;156:587–95. - PubMed
    1. Zhang H, Zhu W, Biskup E, et al. Incidence, risk factors and prognostic characteristics of bone metastases and skeletal‐related events (SREs) in breast cancer patients: a systematic review of the real world data. J Bone Oncol. 2018;11:38–50. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Joniau S, Briganti A, Gontero P, et al. Stratification of high‐risk prostate cancer into prognostic categories: a European multi‐institutional study. Eur Urol. 2015;67:157–64. - PubMed
    1. Oliveira MB, Mello FC, Paschoal ME. The relationship between lung cancer histology and the clinicopathological characteristics of bone metastases. Lung Cancer. 2016;96:19–24. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources