A measure of cognitions specific to seasonal depression: Development and validation of the Seasonal Beliefs Questionnaire
- PMID: 30920245
- PMCID: PMC7988399
- DOI: 10.1037/pas0000715
A measure of cognitions specific to seasonal depression: Development and validation of the Seasonal Beliefs Questionnaire
Abstract
We introduce the Seasonal Beliefs Questionnaire (SBQ), a self-report inventory of maladaptive thoughts about the seasons, light availability, and weather conditions, proposed to constitute a unique cognitive vulnerability to winter seasonal affective disorder (SAD; Rohan, Roecklein, & Haaga, 2009). Potential items were derived from a qualitative analysis of self-reported thoughts during SAD-tailored cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT-SAD) and subsequently refined based on qualitative feedback from 48 SAD patients. In the psychometric study (N = 536 college students), exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses pruned the items to a 26-item scale with a 5-factor solution, demonstrating good internal consistency, convergent and divergent validity, and 2-week test-retest reliability. In a known groups comparison, the SBQ discriminated SAD patients (n = 86) from both nonseasonal major depressive disorder (MDD) patients (n = 30) and healthy controls (n = 110), whereas a generic measure of depressogenic cognitive vulnerability (the Dysfunctional Attitudes Scale [DAS]) discriminated MDD patients from the other groups. In a randomized clinical trial comparing CBT-SAD with light therapy (N = 177), SBQ scores improved at twice the rate in CBT-SAD than in light therapy. Greater change in SBQ scores during CBT-SAD, but not during light therapy, was associated with a lower risk of depression recurrence 2 winters later. In contrast, DAS scores improved comparably during CBT-SAD and light therapy, and DAS change was unrelated to recurrence following either treatment. These results support using the SBQ as a brief assessment tool for a SAD-specific cognitive vulnerability and as a treatment target in CBT-SAD. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no other financial or nonfinancial competing interests.
References
-
- Aycicegi AD, & Harris CL (2003). Assessing adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A Turkish version of the current symptoms scale. Psychopathology, 36, 160–167. - PubMed
-
- Bagby RM, Ryder AG, Schuller DR, & Marshall MB (2004). The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale: Has the gold standard become a lead weight? American Journal of Psychiatry, 161, 2163–2177. - PubMed
-
- Barkley RA, & Murphy KR (1998). Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: A clinical workbook (2nd Ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
-
- Beck AT, Rush AJ, Shaw BF, & Emery G (1979). Cognitive therapy of depression. New York: Guilford Press.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical