Increased Incidence of Symptomatic Venous Thromboembolism following Pedicled Lower Extremity Flap Harvest for Abdominal and Perineal Reconstruction in Patients Receiving Mechanical Prophylaxis and Chemoprophylaxis: A Case for Heightened Awareness
- PMID: 30921148
- DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005473
Increased Incidence of Symptomatic Venous Thromboembolism following Pedicled Lower Extremity Flap Harvest for Abdominal and Perineal Reconstruction in Patients Receiving Mechanical Prophylaxis and Chemoprophylaxis: A Case for Heightened Awareness
Abstract
Background: Postsurgical venous thromboembolism remains a leading cause of hospital morbidity. Data to support venous thromboembolism prophylaxis guidelines in lower extremity flap surgery are lacking. The purpose of this study was to explore the effect of pedicled lower extremity flap harvest on venous thromboembolism development in the setting of abdominal or perineal reconstruction.
Methods: One hundred twenty-six patients undergoing unilateral lower extremity flap harvest for abdominal or perineal reconstruction were included. The contralateral leg served as an internal control. Sixty comorbidity-matched patients who underwent abdominal/perineal resection without flap reconstruction provided an external control. Bivariate analyses included chi-square and t tests; logistic regression adjusted for confounding variables on venous thromboembolism development.
Results: All patients underwent flap reconstruction for an oncologic defect of the abdomen or perineum, with 80 percent undergoing perineal reconstruction. Most patients underwent anterolateral thigh (41 percent) or gracilis flap (40 percent) harvest. Eleven patients developed deep venous thromboses in one or more legs (9 percent): 10 of 11 (90.9 percent) in the donor extremity and five (45.5 percent) contralaterally (p = 0.022). Patients who underwent flap harvest had a 10-fold higher odds of venous thromboembolism formation when compared to comorbidity-matched controls without flap reconstruction (OR, 10.64; 95 percent CI, 1.11 to 102.34; p = 0.041).
Conclusions: The rate of venous thromboembolism is higher than previously appreciated for reconstructive procedures of the abdomen and/or perineum that use pedicled lower extremity flaps-particularly in the operative extremity. Additional research can clarify the role for further prophylaxis or screening.
Clinical question/level of evidence: Therapeutic, III.
References
-
- Deleyiannis FW, Clavijo-Alvarez JA, Pullikkotil B, et al. Deve lopment of consensus guidelines for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in patients undergoing microvascular reconstruction of the mandible. Head Neck 2011;33:1034–1040.
-
- Office of the Surgeon General (US): National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. The Surgeon General’s Call to Action to Prevent Deep Vein Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism. 2008.Rockville, Md:Office of the Surgeon General (US).
-
- Buesing KL, Mullapudi B, Flowers KA. Deep venous thrombosis and venous thromboembolism prophylaxis. Surg Clin North Am. 2015;95:285–300.
-
- Cassidy MR, Rosenkranz P, McAneny D. Reducing postoperative venous thromboembolism complications with a standardized risk-stratified prophylaxis protocol and mobilization program. J Am Coll Surg. 2014;218:1095–1104.
-
- Cohen AT, Tapson VF, Bergmann JF, et al.; ENDORSE Investigators. Venous thromboembolism risk and prophylaxis in the acute hospital care setting (ENDORSE study): A multinational cross-sectional study. Lancet 2008;371:387–394.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials