Predictive validity of developmental milestones for detecting limited intellectual functioning
- PMID: 30921424
- PMCID: PMC6438572
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214475
Predictive validity of developmental milestones for detecting limited intellectual functioning
Abstract
Developmental milestones are commonly used in child health care, although from many milestones the predictive validity has not been adequately assessed. We aimed to determine the predictive validity of 75 developmental milestones for detecting limited intellectual functioning that can be obtained before the age of 4 years. We performed a case-control study with 148 children aged 5-10 years with limited intellectual functioning (IQ 50-69), who were in special education (cases) and a random sample of 300 children aged 5-10 years who were in regular elementary education (controls). Developmental milestones scores were retrieved from Child Healthcare files. We calculated sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratios (LR+) and diagnostic odds ratios (DOR) for limited intellectual functioning. The LR+ determines whether a test result changes the probability that a condition exists. Given the prevalence of intellectual disability (1-3%), we considered that an LR+ > 10 would be clinically useful, as it increases the a priori probability of limited intellectual functioning from 2% to a posteriori probability of at least 17%. Out of 75 assessed milestones, 50 were included in the analysis. We found nine milestones to have a significant adjusted (for socio-economic status and prematurity) DOR > 1 and a significant LR+ > 10 (assessment age in months between brackets): 'says "dada-baba‴ (9), 'balances head well while sitting' (9), 'sits on buttocks while legs stretched' (9), 'babbles while playing' (12), 'sits in stable position without support' (12), 'walks well alone' (24), 'says "sentences" of 3 or more words' (36), 'places 3 forms in form-box' (36) and 'copies circle' (48). Sensitivities of these 9 milestones varied from 8-54%, specificities of these 9 milestones varied from 95-100%. Combining these milestones at 9, 12, and 36 months respectively resulted in sensitivities of 27-60% and specificities of 94-99%. These nine developmental milestones have substantial predictive validity for limited intellectual functioning.
Conflict of interest statement
I have read the journal's policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: We have a potential conflict of interest with the PlosOne editor Jacobus P. van Wouwe, because the first (EV), fifth (PvD) and sixth (PV) authors have worked closely with him. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.
Similar articles
-
Assessing the predictive validity of developmental milestones.J Dev Behav Pediatr. 1982 Sep;3(3):143-5. doi: 10.1097/00004703-198209000-00004. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 1982. PMID: 7130402
-
Do developmental milestones at 4, 8, 12 and 24 months predict IQ at 5-6 years old? Results of the EDEN mother-child cohort.Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2017 Mar;21(2):272-279. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2016.11.001. Epub 2016 Nov 15. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2017. PMID: 27889381
-
[The estimation of premorbid intelligence levels in French speakers].Encephale. 2005 Jan-Feb;31(1 Pt 1):31-43. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(05)82370-x. Encephale. 2005. PMID: 15971638 French.
-
Borderline intellectual functioning: consensus and good practice guidelines.Rev Psiquiatr Salud Ment. 2013 Jul-Sep;6(3):109-20. doi: 10.1016/j.rpsm.2012.12.001. Epub 2013 Feb 4. Rev Psiquiatr Salud Ment. 2013. PMID: 23384877 English, Spanish.
-
Evaluation of the Child With Developmental Impairments.Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2018 Feb;24(1, Child Neurology):228-247. doi: 10.1212/CON.0000000000000564. Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2018. PMID: 29432245 Review.
Cited by
-
Child development with the D-score: turning milestones into measurement.Gates Open Res. 2022 Dec 20;5:81. doi: 10.12688/gatesopenres.13222.2. eCollection 2021. Gates Open Res. 2022. PMID: 39935809 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Age of walking and intellectual ability in autism spectrum disorder and other neurodevelopmental disorders: a population-based study.J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2021 Sep;62(9):1070-1078. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.13369. Epub 2020 Dec 28. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2021. PMID: 33369747 Free PMC article.
-
Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting intellectual disability in children with cerebral palsy.Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2024 Jul-Sep;24(3):100493. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2024.100493. Epub 2024 Aug 31. Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2024. PMID: 39282221 Free PMC article.
-
Perspective: Growth Monitoring and Promotion as an Opportunity to Improve Early Childhood Development.Adv Nutr. 2025 Aug;16(8):100470. doi: 10.1016/j.advnut.2025.100470. Epub 2025 Jun 25. Adv Nutr. 2025. PMID: 40578560 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Role of the Maternal and Child Health Handbook in Developmental Surveillance: The Exploration of Milestone Attainment Trajectories.Front Psychiatry. 2022 Jun 17;13:902158. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.902158. eCollection 2022. Front Psychiatry. 2022. PMID: 35782444 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Mathews KD, Cunniff C, Kantamneni JR, Ciafaloni E, Miller T, Matthews D, et al. Muscular Dystrophy Surveillance Tracking and Research Network (MD STARnet): case definition in surveillance for childhood-onset Duchenne/Becker muscular dystrophy. J Child Neurol 2010. September;25(9):1098–1102. 10.1177/0883073810371001 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Shevell M, Ashwal S, Donley D, Flint J, Gingold M, Hirtz D, et al. Practice parameter: Evaluation of the child with global developmental delay. Neurology 2003. February 11;60(3):367–380. - PubMed
-
- Macy M. The evidence behind developmental screening instruments. Infant Young Child 2012;25(1):19–61.
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources