Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Mar 28;14(3):e0214475.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214475. eCollection 2019.

Predictive validity of developmental milestones for detecting limited intellectual functioning

Affiliations

Predictive validity of developmental milestones for detecting limited intellectual functioning

Eline Vlasblom et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Developmental milestones are commonly used in child health care, although from many milestones the predictive validity has not been adequately assessed. We aimed to determine the predictive validity of 75 developmental milestones for detecting limited intellectual functioning that can be obtained before the age of 4 years. We performed a case-control study with 148 children aged 5-10 years with limited intellectual functioning (IQ 50-69), who were in special education (cases) and a random sample of 300 children aged 5-10 years who were in regular elementary education (controls). Developmental milestones scores were retrieved from Child Healthcare files. We calculated sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratios (LR+) and diagnostic odds ratios (DOR) for limited intellectual functioning. The LR+ determines whether a test result changes the probability that a condition exists. Given the prevalence of intellectual disability (1-3%), we considered that an LR+ > 10 would be clinically useful, as it increases the a priori probability of limited intellectual functioning from 2% to a posteriori probability of at least 17%. Out of 75 assessed milestones, 50 were included in the analysis. We found nine milestones to have a significant adjusted (for socio-economic status and prematurity) DOR > 1 and a significant LR+ > 10 (assessment age in months between brackets): 'says "dada-baba‴ (9), 'balances head well while sitting' (9), 'sits on buttocks while legs stretched' (9), 'babbles while playing' (12), 'sits in stable position without support' (12), 'walks well alone' (24), 'says "sentences" of 3 or more words' (36), 'places 3 forms in form-box' (36) and 'copies circle' (48). Sensitivities of these 9 milestones varied from 8-54%, specificities of these 9 milestones varied from 95-100%. Combining these milestones at 9, 12, and 36 months respectively resulted in sensitivities of 27-60% and specificities of 94-99%. These nine developmental milestones have substantial predictive validity for limited intellectual functioning.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

I have read the journal's policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: We have a potential conflict of interest with the PlosOne editor Jacobus P. van Wouwe, because the first (EV), fifth (PvD) and sixth (PV) authors have worked closely with him. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mathews KD, Cunniff C, Kantamneni JR, Ciafaloni E, Miller T, Matthews D, et al. Muscular Dystrophy Surveillance Tracking and Research Network (MD STARnet): case definition in surveillance for childhood-onset Duchenne/Becker muscular dystrophy. J Child Neurol 2010. September;25(9):1098–1102. 10.1177/0883073810371001 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shevell M, Ashwal S, Donley D, Flint J, Gingold M, Hirtz D, et al. Practice parameter: Evaluation of the child with global developmental delay. Neurology 2003. February 11;60(3):367–380. - PubMed
    1. Lagae L. Learning disabilities: definitions, epidemiology, diagnosis, and intervention strategies. Pediatr Clin North Am 2008. December;55(6):1259–68, vii. 10.1016/j.pcl.2008.08.001 - DOI - PubMed
    1. US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for speech and language delay in preschool children: recommendation statement. Pediatrics 2006. February;117(2):497–501. 10.1542/peds.2005-2766 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Macy M. The evidence behind developmental screening instruments. Infant Young Child 2012;25(1):19–61.