Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2019 Nov;104(11):2258-2264.
doi: 10.3324/haematol.2018.207068. Epub 2019 Mar 28.

Utility of positron emission tomography-computed tomography in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia following B-cell receptor pathway inhibitor therapy

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Utility of positron emission tomography-computed tomography in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia following B-cell receptor pathway inhibitor therapy

Anthony R Mato et al. Haematologica. 2019 Nov.

Abstract

The utility of positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) in distinguishing Richter's transformation versus chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) progression after ibrutinib and/or idelalisib was assessed in a post hoc analysis of a phase II study of venetoclax. Patients underwent PET-CT at screening and were not enrolled/treated if Richter's transformation was confirmed pathologically. Of 167 patients screened, 57 met criteria for biopsy after PET-CT. Of 35 patients who underwent biopsy, eight had Richter's transformation, two had another malignancy, and 25 had CLL. A PET-CT maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) ≥10 had 71% sensitivity and 50% specificity for detecting Richter's transformation [Odds Ratio (OR): 2.5, 95%CI: 0.4-15; P=0.318]. Response rate to venetoclax was similar for screening SUVmax <10 versus ≥10 (65% vs. 62%) (n=127 enrolled), though median progression-free survival was longer at <10 months (24.7 vs. 15.4 months; P=0.0335). Six patients developed Richter's transformation on venetoclax, of whom two had screening biopsy demonstrating CLL (others did not have a biopsy) and five had screening SUVmax <10. We have defined the test characteristics for PET-CT to distinguish progression of CLL as compared to Richter's transformation when biopsied in patients treated with B-cell receptor signaling pathway inhibitors. Overall diminished sensitivity and specificity as compared to prior reports of patients treated with chemotherapy/chemoimmunotherapy suggest it has diminished ability to discriminate these two diagnoses using a SUVmax ≥10 cutoff. This cutoff did not identify venetoclax-treated patients with an inferior response but may be predictive of inferior progression-free survival. (Registered at clinicaltrials.gov identifier: 02141282).

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Outcomes on venetoclax stratified by screening maximum standardized uptake value of 18-F-fluorodeoxyglucose (SUVmax) by positron emission tomography-computed tomography imaging. Shown are the investigator-assessed (A) progression-free survival (PFS), and (B) overall survival (OS) on venetoclax as assessed by the investigator for patients with screening SUVmax <10 (n=114) and SUVmax ≥10 (n=13). (C) Investigator-assessed duration of response is shown for responders on venetoclax stratified by screening SUVmax <10 (n=74) and SUVmax ≥10 (n=8). Number of patients at risk for the event at each time point is shown below each curve. Tick marks represent censored data. n: number.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Time to chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) progression or Richter’s transformation (RT) on venetoclax. Shown is the cumulative incidence of CLL progression or Richter’s transformation on venetoclax. Thirty-three patients discontinued venetoclax due to CLL progression and six due to biopsy-confirmed RT following both imaging and clinical changes. Median time to CLL progression was 8.5 months (range: 0.1-28 months) and to RT was 12.8 months (range: 4.4–19.7 months). Tick marks represent patients with events.

References

    1. Rossi D, Cerri M, Capello D, et al. Biological and clinical risk factors of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia transformation to Richter syndrome. Br J Haematol. 2008;142(2):202–215. - PubMed
    1. Molica S. A systematic review on Richter syndrome: what is the published evidence¿ Leuk Lymphoma. 2010;51(3):415–421. - PubMed
    1. Falchi L, Keating MJ, Marom EM, et al. Correlation between FDG/PET, histology, characteristics, and survival in 332 patients with chronic lymphoid leukemia. Blood. 2014;123(18):2783–2790. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tsimberidou AM, Kantarjian HM, Cortes J, et al. Fractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine, liposomal daunorubicin, and dexamethasone plus rituximab and granulocyte-macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) alternating with methotrexate and cytarabine plus rituximab and GM-CSF in patients with Richter syndrome or fludarabine-refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Cancer. 2003;97(7):1711–1720. - PubMed
    1. Tsimberidou AM, O’Brien SM, Cortes JE, et al. Phase II study of fludarabine, cytarabine (Ara-C), cyclophosphamide, cisplatin and GM-CSF (FACPGM) in patients with Richter’s syndrome or refractory lymphoproliferative disorders. Leuk Lymphoma. 2002;43(4):767–772. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances