Comparison between 8- and 32-channel phased-array receive coils for in vivo hyperpolarized 13 C imaging of the human brain
- PMID: 30927300
- PMCID: PMC6612511
- DOI: 10.1002/mrm.27743
Comparison between 8- and 32-channel phased-array receive coils for in vivo hyperpolarized 13 C imaging of the human brain
Abstract
Purpose: To compare the performance of an 8-channel surface coil/clamshell transmitter and 32-channel head array coil/birdcage transmitter for hyperpolarized 13 C brain metabolic imaging.
Methods: To determine the field homogeneity of the radiofrequency transmitters, B1 + mapping was performed on an ethylene glycol head phantom and evaluated by means of the double angle method. Using a 3D echo-planar imaging sequence, coil sensitivity and noise-only phantom data were acquired with the 8- and 32-channel receiver arrays, and compared against data from the birdcage in transceiver mode. Multislice frequency-specific 13 C dynamic echo-planar imaging was performed on a patient with a brain tumor for each hardware configuration following injection of hyperpolarized [1-13 C]pyruvate. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) was evaluated from pre-whitened phantom and temporally summed patient data after coil combination based on optimal weights.
Results: The birdcage transmitter produced more uniform B1 + compared with the clamshell: 0.07 versus 0.12 (fractional error). Phantom experiments conducted with matched lateral housing separation demonstrated 8- versus 32-channel mean transceiver-normalized SNR performance: 0.91 versus 0.97 at the head center; 6.67 versus 2.08 on the sides; 0.66 versus 2.73 at the anterior; and 0.67 versus 3.17 on the posterior aspect. While the 8-channel receiver array showed SNR benefits along lateral aspects, the 32-channel array exhibited greater coverage and a more uniform coil-combined profile. Temporally summed, parameter-normalized patient data showed SNRmean,slice ratios (8-channel/32-channel) ranging 0.5-2.00 from apical to central brain. White matter lactate-to-pyruvate ratios were conserved across hardware: 0.45 ± 0.12 (8-channel) versus 0.43 ± 0.14 (32-channel).
Conclusion: The 8- and 32-channel hardware configurations each have advantages in particular brain anatomy.
Keywords: 32-channel; brain; carbon-13; echo-planar imaging; hyperpolarized; phased-array.
© 2019 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.
Figures
References
-
- Nelson SJ, Kurhanewicz J, Vigneron DB, Larson PEZ, Harzstark AL, Ferrone M, van Criekinge M, Chang JW, Bok R, Park I, Reed G, Carvajal L, Small EJ, Munster P, Weinberg VK, Ardenkjaer-Larsen JH, Chen AP, Hurd RE, Odegardstuen LI, Robb FJ, Tropp J, Murray JA. Metabolic imaging of patients with prostate cancer using hyperpolarized [1–13C]pyruvate. Sci Transl Med. 2013; 5(198): 198ra108 - PMC - PubMed
-
- Park I, Larson PEZ, Gordon JW, Carvajal L, Chen HY, Bok R, Van Criekinge M, Ferrone M, Slater JB, Xu D, Kurhanewicz J, Vigneron DB, Chang S, Nelson SJ. Development of methods and feasibility of using hyperpolarized carbon-13 imaging data for evaluating brain metabolism in patient studies. Magn Reson Med. 2018; 80(3):864–873 - PMC - PubMed
