Timing and Causes of Unplanned Readmissions After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights From the Nationwide Readmission Database
- PMID: 30928446
- PMCID: PMC6843988
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.02.007
Timing and Causes of Unplanned Readmissions After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights From the Nationwide Readmission Database
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this study was to describe the rates and causes of unplanned readmissions at different time periods following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
Background: The rates and causes of readmission at different time periods after PCI remain incompletely elucidated.
Methods: Patients undergoing PCI between 2010 and 2014 in the U.S. Nationwide Readmission Database were evaluated for the rates, causes, predictors, and costs of unplanned readmission between 0 and 7 days, 8 and 30 days, 31 and 90 days, and 91 and 180 days after index discharge.
Results: This analysis included 2,412,000 patients; 2.5% were readmitted between 0 and 7 days, 7.6% between 8 and 30 days, 8.9% between 31 and 90 days, and 8.0% between 91 and 180 days (cumulative rates 2.5%, 9.9%, 18.0%, and 24.8%, respectively). The majority of readmissions during each time period were due to noncardiac causes (53.1% to 59.6%). Nonspecific chest pain was the most common identifiable noncardiac cause for readmission during each time period (14.2% to 22.7% of noncardiac readmissions). Coronary artery disease including angina was the most common cardiac cause for readmission during each time period (37.4% to 39.3% of cardiac readmissions). The second most common cardiac cause for readmission was acute myocardial infarction between 0 and 7 days (27.6% of cardiac readmissions) and heart failure during all subsequent time periods (22.2% to 23.7% of cardiac readmissions).
Conclusions: Approximately 25% of patients following PCI have unplanned readmissions within 6 months. Causes of readmission depend on the timing at which they are assessed, with noncardiovascular causes becoming more important at longer time points.
Keywords: cost; percutaneous coronary intervention; readmissions.
Copyright © 2019 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Figures
Comment in
-
The Bounce Back: Should Hospital Readmission Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Be the Next Focus of Our Quality Efforts?JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Apr 22;12(8):749-751. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.12.041. Epub 2019 Mar 27. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019. PMID: 30928447 No abstract available.
References
-
- Stuntz M, PaLak A. Recent trends in percutaneous coronary intervention volume in the United States. Value Health 2016;19:A347.
-
- Stathopoulos I, Jimenez M, Panagopoulos G, et al. The decline in PCI complication rate: 2003–2006 versus 1999–2002. Hellenic J Cardiol 2009;50:379–87. - PubMed
-
- Valle JA, Smith DE, Booher AM, Menees DS, Gurm HS. Cause and circumstance of in-hospital mortality among patients undergoing contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2012;5:229–35. - PubMed
-
- Kwok CS, Rao SV, Potts JE, et al. Burden of 30-day readmissions after percutaneous coronary intervention in 833,344 patients in the United States: predictors, causes, and cost: insights from the Nationwide Readmissions Database. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2018;11:665–74. - PubMed
-
- Kwok CS, Rao SV, Gilchrist I, et al. Relation between age and unplanned readmissions after percutaneous coronary intervention (findings from the Nationwide Readmission Database). Am J Cardiol 2018;122:220–8. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
