Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2019 Mar 30;9(3):e026478.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026478.

Methodological advantages and disadvantages of parallel and crossover randomised clinical trials on methylphenidate for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: a systematic review and meta-analyses

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Methodological advantages and disadvantages of parallel and crossover randomised clinical trials on methylphenidate for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: a systematic review and meta-analyses

Helle B Krogh et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objective: To assess the methodological advantages and disadvantages of parallel and crossover designs in randomised clinical trials on methylphenidate for children and adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).

Design: Secondary analyses of a Cochrane systematic review.

Setting and participants: We searched relevant databases up to March 2015 and included data from parallel and crossover randomised trials assessing children and adolescents up to 18 years with ADHD.

Interventions: Methylphenidate compared with placebo or no-treatment interventions.

Primary and secondary outcomes: The primary outcomes were teacher-rated ADHD symptoms and serious adverse events. The secondary outcomes were non-serious adverse events.

Results: We included 38 parallel trials (n=5111) and 147 crossover trials (n=7134). When comparing methylphenidate with placebo or no-treatment on ADHD symptoms, we found no differences between the end of parallel trials and the first-period from crossover trials (Χ²=1.06, df=1, p=0.30, I²=5.5%). We also found no differences when combining the end of first-period crossover trials with the end of parallel trials and comparing them to the end of last-period crossover trials (Χ²=3.25, df=1, p=0.07, I²=69.2%). We found no differences in serious and non-serious adverse events, and no risk of period and carryover effects. However, only two trials contributed data to the latter analyses.

Conclusions: Both parallel and crossover trials seem suitable for investigating methylphenidate in children and adolescents with ADHD, with comparable estimates on ADHD symptom severity and adverse events. However, parallel trials might still offer ethical and statistical advantages over crossover trials.

Keywords: adhd; attention deficit hyperactivity disorder; crossover trial; methylphenidate; parallel trial.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses flowchart. ADHD, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder; RCT, randomised clinical trials.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Data from the end of the parallel trials compared with the end of the first period of the crossover trials on the effects of methylphenidate compared with placebo or no intervention on teacher-rated attention deficit hyperactivity disorder symptoms.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Data from the end of the parallel trials plus the end of the first period of the crossover trials compared with data from the end of the last period of the crossover trials on the effects of methylphenidate versus placebo or no intervention on teacher-rated attention deficit hyperactivity disorder symptoms.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Data from the end of the first period compared with data from the end of the last period of crossover trials on the effects of methylphenidate versus placebo or no intervention on teacher-rated attention deficit hyperactivity disorder symptoms.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Data from parallel trials compared with data from end of the last period of crossover trials on serious adverse events.

References

    1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-V). 5th Ed Arlington, Va: American Psychiatric Association, 2013.
    1. World Health Organization. The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders: clinical descriptions and diagnostic guidelines, 2004.
    1. NICE. Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: diagnosis and management (NG87). National institute for health and care excellence. 2018. nice.org.uk/guidance/ng87 (accessed 13 Nov 2018). - PubMed
    1. Frölich J, Banaschewski T, Döpfner M, et al. . An evaluation of the pharmacokinetics of methylphenidate for the treatment of attention-deficit/ hyperactivity disorder. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 2014;10:1169–83. 10.1517/17425255.2014.922542 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Storebø OJ, Ramstad E, Krogh HB, et al. . Methylphenidate for children and adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015;48:CD009885 10.1002/14651858.CD009885.pub2 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances