Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2019 Mar 30;9(3):e026590.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026590.

The effect of luseogliflozin and alpha-glucosidase inhibitor on heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in diabetic patients: rationale and design of the MUSCAT-HF randomised controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

The effect of luseogliflozin and alpha-glucosidase inhibitor on heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in diabetic patients: rationale and design of the MUSCAT-HF randomised controlled trial

Kentaro Ejiri et al. BMJ Open. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Introduction: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a strong risk factor for coronary artery disease and heart failure, particularly heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). The aim of the ongoing MUSCAT-HF (It stands for Prospective Comparison of Luseogliflozin and Alpha-glucosidase on the Management of Diabetic Patients with Chronic Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction) trial is to evaluate the efficacy of luseogliflozin, a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor, versus voglibose, an alpha-glucosidase inhibitor, using brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) as the index of therapeutic effect in T2DM patients with HFpEF.

Methods and analysis: A total of 190 patients with T2DM and HFpEF (ejection fraction >45%) who are drug-naïve or taking any anti-diabetic agents will be randomised (1:1) to receive luseogliflozin 2.5 mg one time per day or voglibose 0.2 mg three times per day. The patients will be stratified by age (<65 years, ≥65 years), baseline haemoglobin A1c (<8.0%, ≥8.0%), baseline BNP (<100 pg/mL, ≥100 pg/mL), baseline renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m2, <60 mL/min/1.73 m2), use of thiazolidine or not and presence or absence of atrial fibrillation and flutter at screening. After randomisation, participants will receive the study drug for 12 weeks in addition to their background therapy. The primary endpoint is the proportional change in baseline BNP after 12 weeks of treatment. The key secondary endpoints are the change from baseline in the ratio of early mitral inflow velocity to mitral annular early diastolic velocity, body weight and glycaemic control after 12 weeks of treatment.

Ethics and dissemination: The study has been approved by the ethics committee and the patients will be included after informed consent. The results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals.

Trial registration number: UMIN000018395.

Keywords: brain natriuretic peptide; heart failure; luseogliflozin; sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor; type 2 diabetes mellitus; voglibose.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: KE, SS, MM, SN and AT have no competing interests to declare. TM and KN has received honorarium from Novartis Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland). HI has received research funding and honorarium from Novartis Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland).

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study design. Arrows illustrate the patients’ flow and the timing of follow-up. The patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus are screened whether with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction or without (screening period, yellow arrow). One of the study drugs was administered to the patients met inclusion criteria after collection of baseline data within 1 week after randomisation (grey arrow). After administration, mandatory follow-up period is for 12 weeks (study follow-up period, blue arrow). After 12 weeks, expanding follow-up are continued in the patients agreed with (arrow with dotted line). During expanding follow-up, the change of an allocated drug was not allowed. ECG, electrocardiogram.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Assessments during the study period.

References

    1. Lindman BR, Dávila-Román VG, Mann DL, et al. . Cardiovascular phenotype in HFpEF patients with or without diabetes: a RELAX trial ancillary study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014;64:541–9. 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.05.030 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kannel WB, Hjortland M, Castelli WP. Role of diabetes in congestive heart failure: the Framingham study. Am J Cardiol 1974;34:29–34. 10.1016/0002-9149(74)90089-7 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Turnbull FM, Abraira C, Anderson RJ, et al. . Intensive glucose control and macrovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia 2009;52:2288–98. 10.1007/s00125-009-1470-0 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kim J, Nakatani S, Hashimura K, et al. . Abnormal glucose tolerance contributes to the progression of chronic heart failure in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. Hypertens Res 2006;29:775–82. 10.1291/hypres.29.775 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chiasson JL, Josse RG, Gomis R, et al. . Acarbose treatment and the risk of cardiovascular disease and hypertension in patients with impaired glucose tolerance: the STOP-NIDDM trial. JAMA 2003;290:486–94. 10.1001/jama.290.4.486 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

Associated data