Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Mar 29;9(4):34.
doi: 10.3390/bs9040034.

Perception and Deception: Human Beauty and the Brain

Affiliations
Review

Perception and Deception: Human Beauty and the Brain

Daniel B Yarosh. Behav Sci (Basel). .

Abstract

Human physical characteristics and their perception by the brain are under pressure by natural selection to optimize reproductive success. Men and women have different strategies to appear attractive and have different interests in identifying beauty in people. Nevertheless, men and women from all cultures agree on who is and who is not attractive, and throughout the world attractive people show greater acquisition of resources and greater reproductive success than others. The brain employs at least three modules, composed of interconnected brain regions, to judge facial attractiveness: one for identification, one for interpretation and one for valuing. Key elements that go into the judgment are age and health, as well as symmetry, averageness, face and body proportions, facial color and texture. These elements are all Costly Signals of reproductive fitness because they are difficult to fake. However, people deceive others using tricks such as coloring hair, cosmetics and clothing styles, while at the same time they also focus on detecting fakes. People may also deceive themselves, especially about their own attractiveness, and use self-signally actions to demonstrate to themselves their own true value. The neuroscience of beauty is best understood by considering the evolutionary pressures to maximize reproductive fitness.

Keywords: attractiveness; cosmetics; costly signals; deception; evolutionary biology; facial beauty; self-signaling.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Bovet J. The Evolution of Feminine Beauty. In: Kapoula Z., Volle E., Renoult J., Andreatta M., editors. Exploring Transdisciplinarity in Art and Sciences. Springer International; Heidelberg, Germany: 2018. pp. 327–357.
    1. Langlois J., Rubenstein A., Larson A., Hallam M., Smoot M. Maxim or Myths of Beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychol. Bull. 2000;126:390–423. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.126.3.390. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ramsey J., Langlois J., Hoss R., Rubenstein A., Griffin A. Origins of a stereotype: Categorization of facial attractiveness by 6-month-old infants. Dev. Sci. 2004;7:201–211. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2004.00339.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Halberstadt J. Proximate and ultimate origins of a bias for prototypical faces. In: Forgas J., Haselton M., von Hippel W., editors. Evolution and the Social Mind. Psychology Press; Sydney, Australia: 2007. pp. 245–262.
    1. Jokela M. Physical attractiveness and reproductive success in humans: Evidence from the late 20th century United States. Evol. Hum. Behav. 2009;30:342–350. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2009.03.006. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources