First assessment of the performance of an implantable continuous glucose monitoring system through 180 days in a primarily adolescent population with type 1 diabetes
- PMID: 30938036
- PMCID: PMC6618327
- DOI: 10.1111/dom.13726
First assessment of the performance of an implantable continuous glucose monitoring system through 180 days in a primarily adolescent population with type 1 diabetes
Abstract
Aim: To investigate the performance of the Eversense XL implantable continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) system through 180 days in a primarily adolescent population with type 1 diabetes (T1D).
Materials and methods: This prospective, single-centre, single-arm, 180-day study evaluated the effectiveness and safety of the implantable CGM system in Canadian adolescent and adult subjects with T1D. Accuracy measures included mean absolute relative difference (MARD), 15/15% agreement between CGM glucose and blood glucose measured by Yellow Springs Instruments and surveillance error grid analysis. Adolescent subjects received one sensor in the upper arm and adult subjects received one sensor in each upper arm. In-clinic CGM system accuracy studies were performed every 30 days. The safety assessment included the incidence of adverse events related to either device or the insertion/removal procedure through 180 days.
Results: Thirty-six subjects (30 adolescent/6 adult, 13 female/23 male, mean age 17 ± 9.2 years, mean body mass index 22 ± 4 kg/m2 ) received the CGM system. Overall MARD was 9.4% (95% CI: 8.6%-10.5%). CGM system agreement at 15/15% (N = 7163) through 60, 120 and 180 days was 82.9% (95% CI: 78.4%-86.1%), 83.6% (95% CI: 80.4%-85.7%) and 83.4% (95% CI: 79.7%-85.5%), respectively. Surveillance error grid analysis showed 98.4% of paired values in clinically acceptable error zones A and B. No insertion/removal or device-related serious adverse events were reported.
Conclusion: The Eversense XL CGM system is safe and accurate through 180 days in a primarily adolescent population of subjects with T1D.
Keywords: clinical trial; continuous glucose monitoring; type 1 diabetes.
© 2019 The Authors. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
R.A. reports research support from AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, Boehringer Ingelheim, Valeant, Janssen and Senseonics, and has been part of an advisory panel for Novo Nordisk and Sanofi.
A.A. reports research support or honoraria from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Gilead, GlaskoSmithKline, JA DeSeve, JDRF, Lexicon, Merck Canada, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Sanofi, Senseonics, Zealand and Xeris.
K.S.T. is an employee of Senseonics, Inc.
Figures
References
-
- Beck RW, Riddlesworth T, Ruedy K, et al. Effect of continuous glucose monitoring on glycemic control in adults with type 1 diabetes using insulin injections: The DIAMOND Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2017;317:371‐378. - PubMed
-
- Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation Continuous Glucose Monitoring Study Group . Effectiveness of continuous glucose monitoring in a clinical care environment: evidence from the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation continuous glucose monitoring (JDRF‐CGM) trial. Diabetes Care. 2010;33:17‐22. - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
