Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 May;29(4):285-304.
doi: 10.1089/cap.2018.0132. Epub 2019 Apr 3.

Weight and Height in Children and Adolescents with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Longitudinal Database Study Assessing the Impact of Guanfacine, Stimulants, and No Pharmacotherapy

Affiliations

Weight and Height in Children and Adolescents with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Longitudinal Database Study Assessing the Impact of Guanfacine, Stimulants, and No Pharmacotherapy

Gary Schneider et al. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2019 May.

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the impact of long-term pharmacotherapy with guanfacine immediate- or extended-release (GXR), administered alone or as an adjunctive to a stimulant, on weight and height in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Methods: Data were extracted from U.S. Department of Defense medical records for patients 4-17 years of age at index date (initiation of any study medication following a year without ADHD medications, or diagnosis if unmedicated) with weight/height measurements for the analysis period (January 2009-June 2013) and the previous year (baseline). Longitudinal weight and height z-scores were analyzed using multivariable regression in three cohorts: guanfacine (initial period of guanfacine exposure), first-line stimulant monotherapy (initial period of exposure), and unmedicated. Guanfacine cohort subgroups were based on previous/concurrent stimulant exposure. Results: The weight analyses included 47,910 patients (66.8% male) and the height analyses 41,248 (67.2% male). Mean initial exposure in the weight analyses was 237 days (standard deviation [SD] = 258, median = 142) for guanfacine and 257 days (SD = 284, median = 151) for first-line stimulant monotherapy, and was similar in the height analyses. Modeling indicated that guanfacine monotherapy was not associated with clinically meaningful deviations from normal z-score trajectories for weight (first-line, n = 943; nonfirst-line, n = 796) or height (first-line, n = 741; nonfirst-line, n = 644). In patients receiving guanfacine adjunctive to a stimulant, modeled weight (n = 1657) and height (n = 1343) z-scores followed declining trajectories. In this subgroup, mean standardized weight/height had decreased during previous stimulant monotherapy. For first-line stimulant monotherapy, modeled weight (n = 32,999) and height (n = 28,470) z-scores followed declining trajectories during year 1. In the unmedicated cohort, modeled weight (n = 11,515) and height (n = 10,050) z-scores were stable. Conclusions: Guanfacine monotherapy (first-line or nonfirst-line) was not associated with marked deviations from normal growth in this modeling study of children and adolescents with ADHD. In contrast, growth trajectories followed an initially declining course with stimulants, whether given alone or with adjunctive guanfacine.

Keywords: attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder; guanfacine; height; stimulant; weight.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

This study was funded by Shire Development LLC, now part of Takeda. Shire, now part of Takeda, develops and markets medications for ADHD. Evidera received funding from Shire Development LLC for designing and conducting this study and analyzing and reporting the results. Oxford PharmaGenesis, Oxford, United Kingdom received funding from Shire International GmbH for writing and editing support. Under the direction of the authors, writing assistance was provided by Dr. Heather Lang and Dr. Matt Cottingham, employees of Oxford PharmaGenesis; editorial assistance in formatting, proofreading, copy editing, and fact checking was also provided by Oxford PharmaGenesis. All authors had full access to the study report and results, and had final responsibility for the decision to submit the article for publication. All authors contributed to the preparation of this article and to interpretation of the results. G.S. designed the study. G.S. and B.M. performed the statistical analyses. W.M.S. is an employee of Shire, now part of Takeda. B.M. and M.R. are employees of Evidera. G.S. is a former employee of Evidera. B.L.F. is a military service member. This work was prepared as part of his official duties.

The following authors have received compensation for serving as consultants or speakers for, or they or the institutions they work for have received research support or royalties from, the companies or organizations indicated: T.B. (Actelion, Hexal Pharma, Lilly, Lundbeck, Medice, Neurim Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Shire, and Vifor Pharma), P.A.G. (Lilly and Shire), D.R.C. (Eli Lilly, Janssen-Cilag, Medice, Novartis, Oxford University Press, and Shire).

Research data derived from an approved Naval Medical Center, Portsmouth, VA IRB protocol (NMCP.2013.0053). The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Department of the Navy, Department of Defense, or the United States Government. Copyright Notice: CAPT B.L.F. is a military service member. This work was prepared as part of his official duties. Title 17 U.S.C. 105 provides that “Copyright protection under this title is not available for any work of the United States Government.” Title 17 U.S.C. 101 defines a United States Government work as a work prepared by a military service member or employee of the United States Government as part of that person's official duties.

The corresponding author can be contacted for further details about the study and the data.

Figures

<b>FIG. 1.</b>
FIG. 1.
Study cohorts. aFirst study medication is guanfacine monotherapy; subsequent stimulant prescriptions permissible. bStimulant exposure ended before or up to 28 days after first guanfacine prescription. Index date (stimulant initiation) could predate the start of the baseline period. Stimulant exposure before guanfacine initiation need not be continuous. cFirst guanfacine prescription simultaneous with a stimulant prescription or concurrent with stimulant exposure for more than 28 days. Initial period of exposure ends at discontinuation of guanfacine and/or stimulant. Index date (stimulant initiation) could predate the start of the baseline period and stimulant exposure before guanfacine initiation need not be continuous. dFirst study medication is stimulant monotherapy; no guanfacine prescription at any time. eNo prescriptions for any ADHD medication (a study medication or atomoxetine). fBaseline measurement is the most recent weight or height measurement during the baseline period (the 12 months before time = 0). gGuanfacine initiation date in the guanfacine cohort, index date in other cohorts. ADHD, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
<b>FIG. 2.</b>
FIG. 2.
Calculation of prescribed amount (in days) of a study medication for different drugs or for different doses of the same drug: with no overlaps between prescriptions (a), with overlaps ≤90 days (b), or with overlaps >90 days (c). aStudy medications: guanfacine (any formulation of GXR or GIR); stimulant (any formulations of amphetamine or methylphenidate). bFor example, GXR 4 mg/day. cFor example, GXR <> 4 mg/day or GIR any dose. GIR, guanfacine immediate release; GXR, guanfacine extended release.
<b>FIG. 3.</b>
FIG. 3.
Modeled z-scores for weight (a–c) and height (d–f) in the guanfacine cohort for all patients (a, d), males (b, e), and females (c, f). Solid lines show the trajectories when all other predictor variables are held constant to their overall means for patients in the guanfacine cohort, apart from “stimulant supply preguanfacine,” which is held constant to the mean of each subgroup. Traces show a random sample of patients. Numbers below the x axes indicate the numbers of patients with weight/height measurements on or after each time point.
<b>FIG. 4.</b>
FIG. 4.
Modeled z-scores for weight (a–c) and height (d–f) in the first-line stimulant monotherapy and unmedicated cohorts for all patients (a, d), males (b, e), and females (c, f). Solid lines show the trajectories when all other predictor variables are held constant to the mean of each cohort. Traces show a random sample of patients. Numbers below the x axes indicate the numbers of patients with weight/height measurements on or after each time point.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th ed., Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2000
    1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th ed., (DSM-5). Washington, D.C: American Psychiatric Association; 2013
    1. Banaschewski T, Johnson M, Nagy P, Otero IH, Soutullo CA, Yan B, Zuddas A, Coghill DR: Growth and puberty in a 2-year open-label study of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. CNS Drugs 32:455–467, 2018 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Biederman J, Melmed RD, Patel A, McBurnett K, Donahue J, Lyne A: Long-term, open-label extension study of guanfacine extended release in children and adolescents with ADHD. CNS Spectr 13:1047–1055, 2008a - PubMed
    1. Biederman J, Melmed RD, Patel A, McBurnett K, Konow J, Lyne A, Scherer N; SPD503 Study Group: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of guanfacine extended release in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Pediatrics 121:e73–e84, 2008b - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances