Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2018 Nov;42(8):617-627.
doi: 10.1080/03091902.2019.1591534. Epub 2019 Apr 3.

Restoration of wall shear stress in the cephalic vein during extreme hemodynamics

Affiliations
Observational Study

Restoration of wall shear stress in the cephalic vein during extreme hemodynamics

M E Boghosian et al. J Med Eng Technol. 2018 Nov.

Abstract

The surgical creation of an artery-vein connection via a Brachicephalic fistula (BCF) in patients with end stage renal disease (ESRD) provides a unique opportunity to study blood vessel response mechanisms to extreme hemodynamic conditions in relatively short timeframes. After BCF creation, the flow rate in the vein increases by an order of magnitude leading to separated flows and corresponding abnormally low, or negative, wall shear stress (WSS) in the curved arch segment of the cephalic vein. Locations of abnormally low WSS are shown to correlate with development of neointimal hyperplasia (NH) and subsequent stenosis. It is found that the stenosis, prior to a surgical intervention, restores the normal physiological WSS in the vein. As a result, this investigation provides evidence that the adaptation principle, known to apply in the arterial system, is also valid in the venous system. A novel graphical method is developed that combines clinical and computational data to assist in interpreting these physiological mechanisms including adaptation that lead to changes in vein geometry over time.

Keywords: Cephalic; brachiocephalic; fistula; vein adaptation; wall shear stress.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest. No benefits in any form have been received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this manuscript.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
(a) Example venograms illustrating the cephalic vein and arch. The blood flow is from right to left. Note a collateral vein is present in the arch but is observed to degrade over time.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
The zone scatter plot. Characterization of postulated vein response mechanisms by zones based on τw and ∆d*. NPR for the cephalic vein is the area inside the grey region, corresponding to 0.076 < τw < 0.76 Pa.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Examples of patient-specific cephalic veins illustrating typical flow patterns, low wall shear stress regions, and postulated response mechanisms. Red colour indicates abnormally low wall shear stresses, i.e. τw < 0.076 Pa, and gray lines are streamlines. Note length scales are not identical due to different vein lengths.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Wall shear stresses plotted on horizontal axis for cephalic vein prior to BCF creation in 12 patients based upon ESRD patient-specific geometries, and measured velocities and viscosities. NPR of 0.076 < τw < 0.76 Pa is area between red dashed lines. Here, the average WSS is 0.22 Pa and is denoted by red *. This is the same data as Figure 3 of Hammes et al. [27] plotted in the present format.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Case 1: ψ-τw contour plots illustrating cephalic vein adaptation for patient 26. τw < 0.076 Pa denoted by red lines.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
Case 1: Adaptation in cephalic vein for patient 26, cf. Fig. 5.
Figure 7.
Figure 7.
Case 2: Adaptation interrupted by surgical intervention for patient 14 (typical scenario).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Miller P, Tulwani A, Lusey C, and et al., 1999. “Predictors of adequacy of arteriovenous fistulas in hemodialysis patients”. Kidney Int, 56, pp. 275–286. - PubMed
    1. Rodriguez J, Armandans L, Ferrer E, Olmos A, Cordina S, Bartolome J, Borrelas J, and Piers L, 2000. “The function of permanent vascular access”. Nephrol Dial Transplant, 15, pp. 402–408. - PubMed
    1. Hammes M, Funaki B, and Coe F, 2008. “Cephalic arch stenosis in patients with fistula access for hemodialysis: relationship to diabetes and thrombosis”. Hemodial Int, 12, pp. 85–89. - PubMed
    1. Jaberi A, Schwartz D, Marticorena R, Dacouris N, Prabhudesai V, McFarlane P, and Donnelly S, 2007. “Risk factors for the development of cephalic arch stenosis”. J Vasc Access, 8, pp. 287–295. - PubMed
    1. Sivananthan G, Menashe L, and Halin N, 2014. “Cephalic arch stenosis in dialysis patients: review of clinical relevance, anatomy, current theories on etiology and management”. J Vasc Access, 15, pp. 157–162. - PubMed

Publication types