Seriously misleading results using inverse of Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation in meta-analysis of single proportions
- PMID: 30945438
- PMCID: PMC6767151
- DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.1348
Seriously misleading results using inverse of Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation in meta-analysis of single proportions
Abstract
Standard generic inverse variance methods for the combination of single proportions are based on transformed proportions using the logit, arcsine, and Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformations. Generalized linear mixed models are another more elaborate approach. Irrespective of the approach, meta-analysis results are typically back-transformed to the original scale in order to ease interpretation. Whereas the back-transformation of meta-analysis results is straightforward for most transformations, this is not the case for the Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation, albeit possible. In this case study with five studies, we demonstrate how seriously misleading the back-transformation of the Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation can be. We conclude that this transformation should only be used with special caution for the meta-analysis of single proportions due to potential problems with the back-transformation. Generalized linear mixed models seem to be a promising alternative.
Keywords: back-transformation; generalized linear mixed model; harmonic mean; random intercept logistic regression; variance stabilization.
© 2019 The Authors Research Synthesis Methods Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
The author reported no conflict of interest.
Figures





References
-
- Barendregt J, Doi S, Lee Y, Norman R, Vos T. Meta‐analysis of prevalence. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2013;67(11):974‐8. - PubMed
-
- Baxter A, Scott K, Vos T, Whiteford H. Global prevalence of anxiety disorders: a systematic review and meta‐regression. Psychol Med. 2013;43(5):897‐910. - PubMed
-
- Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JP, Rothstein HR. A basic introduction to fixed‐effect and random‐effects models for meta‐analysis. Res Synth Methods. 2010;1(2):97‐111. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical