Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Apr;20(4):45-50.
doi: 10.1002/acm2.12557.

Tattoo free setup for partial breast irradiation: A feasibility study

Affiliations

Tattoo free setup for partial breast irradiation: A feasibility study

Rachel B Jimenez et al. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2019 Apr.

Abstract

Purpose: Patients undergoing external beam accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) receive permanent tattoos to aid with daily setup alignment and verification. With the advent of three-dimensional (3D) body surface imaging and two-dimensional (2D) x-ray imaging-based matching to surgical clips, tattoos may not be necessary to ensure setup accuracy. We compared the accuracy of conventional tattoo-based setups to a patient setup without tattoos.

Materials/methods: Twenty consecutive patients receiving APBI at our institution from July 10, 2017 to February 13, 2018 were identified. All patients received tattoos per standard of care. Ten patients underwent setup using tattoos for initial positioning followed by surface imaging and 2D matching of surgical clips. The other ten patients underwent positioning using surface imaging followed by 2D matching without reference to tattoos. Overall setup time and orthogonal x-ray-based shifts after surface imaging per fraction were recorded. Shift data were used to calculate systematic and random error.

Results: Among ten patients in the "no tattoo" group, the average setup time per fraction was 6.83 min vs 8.03 min in the tattoo cohort (P < 0.01). Mean 3D vector shifts for patients in the "no tattoo" group were 4.6 vs 5.9 mm in the "tattoo" cohort (P = NS). Mean systematic errors in the "no tattoo" group were: 1.2 mm (1.5 mm SD) superior/inferior, 0.5 mm (1.6 mm SD) right/left, and 2.3 mm (1.9 mm SD) anterior/posterior directions. Mean systematic errors in the "tattoo" group were: 0.8 mm (2.2 mm SD) superior/inferior, 0.3 mm (2.5 mm SD) right/left, and 1.4 mm (4.4 mm SD) anterior/posterior directions. The random errors in the "no tattoo" group ranged from 0.6 to 0.7 mm vs 1.2 to 1.7 mm in the "tattoo" group.

Conclusions: Using both surface imaging and 2D matching to surgical clips provides excellent accuracy in APBI patient alignment and setup verification with reduced setup time relative to the tattoo cohort. Skin-based tattoos may no longer be warranted for patients receiving external beam APBI.

Keywords: APBI; breast radiotherapy; surface imaging; tattoos.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Dr. Gierga has previously received speaking honoraria for VisionRT. The remaining authors have no conflict of interest to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Institutional tattoo setup per current standards of care.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(a) Region of interest (ROI) using AlignRT for APBI with (b) associated example daily orthogonal x ray, and (c) digitally reconstructed radiograph.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Initial setup errors detected by surface imaging.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Setup errors detected by x rays following surface imaging.

References

    1. Fobair P, Stewart SL, Chang S, et al. Body image and sexual problems in young women with breast cancer. Psychooncology. 2006;15:579–594. - PubMed
    1. Clow B, Allen J. Psychosocial impacts of radiation tattooing for breast cancer patients: a critical review. Canadian Woman Studies. 2010;28:46–52.
    1. Fingeret MC, Teo I, Epner DE. Managing body image difficulties of adult cancer patients: lessons from available research. Cancer. 2014;120:633–641. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sewak S, Graham P, Nankervis J. Tattoo allergy in patients receiving adjuvant radiotherapy for breast cancer. Austr Radiol. 1999;43:558–561. - PubMed
    1. Bregnhol A, Haedersal M. Q‐switched YAG laser vs. punch biopsy excision for iatrogenic radiation tattoo markers – a randomized controlled trial. J Eur Acam Dermatol Venereol. 2010;24:1183–1186. - PubMed