Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1986 Sep 27;293(6550):800-4.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.293.6550.800.

Computer aided diagnosis of acute abdominal pain: a multicentre study

Clinical Trial

Computer aided diagnosis of acute abdominal pain: a multicentre study

I D Adams et al. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). .

Abstract

A multicentre study of computer aided diagnosis for patients with acute abdominal pain was performed in eight centres with over 250 participating doctors and 16,737 patients. Performance in diagnosis and decision making was compared over two periods: a test period (when a small computer system was provided to aid diagnosis) and a baseline period (before the system was installed). The two periods were well matched for type of case and rate of accrual. The system proved reliable and was used in 75.1% of possible cases. User reaction was broadly favourable. During the test period improvements were noted in diagnosis, decision making, and patient outcome. Initial diagnostic accuracy rose from 45.6% to 65.3%. The negative laparotomy rate fell by almost half, as did the perforation rate among patients with appendicitis (from 23.7% to 11.5%). The bad management error rate fell from 0.9% to 0.2%, and the observed mortality fell by 22.0%. The savings made were estimated as amounting to 278 laparotomies and 8,516 bed nights during the trial period--equivalent throughout the National Health Service to annual savings in resources worth over 20m pounds and direct cost savings of over 5m pounds. Computer aided diagnosis is a useful system for improving diagnosis and encouraging better clinical practice.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Br Med J. 1972 Apr 1;2(5804):9-13 - PubMed
    1. Br Med J. 1975 Apr 12;2(5962):73-5 - PubMed
    1. J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1976 May;21(3):170-2 - PubMed
    1. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1985 Jan 5;290(6461):17-23 - PubMed
    1. Am J Epidemiol. 1978 Aug;108(2):100-2 - PubMed

Publication types