Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Apr 4;19(1):98.
doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1528-8.

A qualitative review of the design thinking framework in health professions education

Affiliations
Review

A qualitative review of the design thinking framework in health professions education

Jacqueline E McLaughlin et al. BMC Med Educ. .

Abstract

Background: Design thinking is a problem-solving framework that has been used to enhance patient experiences, improve clinical outcomes, and refine medical curricula. This study reviewed the use of design thinking in health professions education.

Methods: A search yielded 169 articles, which were excluded if they were: (1) not related to education; (2) lacking an application of design thinking; or (3) not associated with healthcare. The final review yielded 15 articles, which were analyzed using qualitative methods.

Results: All articles were published in 2009 or later and were diverse in their context, participants, and approach. Six studies emphasized the early stages of design thinking, with inspiration and ideation stages fostered through a variety of activities, such as lectures, small group discussions, and workshops. Studies examined a range of outcomes, including self-efficacy, perceptions, and solutions to a specific problem.

Conclusions: Our findings raise important considerations for health professions education, including the extent to which we should: 1) teach design thinking to students as a skill-based tool to prepare students for problem solving in complex healthcare environments; and 2) use design thinking to create, implement, and refine health professions curricula and educational programs. Despite the apparent benefits of design thinking, many questions for health professions education remain.

Keywords: Creativity; Curriculum development; Design thinking; Innovation; Problem solving.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

No data were collected from or about individuals, therefore consent was not necessary for this study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable – data (e.g. video, details, images) from individuals were not included in this manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Article Review Flow Diagram

References

    1. Baruck J. Doctors as makers. Acad Med. 2017;92:40–44. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001312. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Berwick DM, Finkelstein JA. Preparing medical students for the continual improvement of health and health care: Abraham Flexner and the new “public interest”. Acad Med. 2010;85:556–565. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181ead779. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Iby DM, Cooke M, O’Brien BC. Calls for reform of medical education by the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching: 1910 and 2010. Acad Med. 2010;85:220–227. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181c88449. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Roth MT, Mumper RJ, Singleton SF, Lee CR, Rodgers PT, Cox WC, et al. A renaissance in pharmacy education at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. NC Med J. 2014;75(1):48–52. - PubMed
    1. Shaw J. Rethinking the medical curriculum. Harvard magazine website. http://harvardmagazine.com/2015/08/rethinking-the-medical-curriculum. Published August 20, 2015. Accessed 18 Dec 2018.

LinkOut - more resources