A qualitative review of the design thinking framework in health professions education
- PMID: 30947748
- PMCID: PMC6449899
- DOI: 10.1186/s12909-019-1528-8
A qualitative review of the design thinking framework in health professions education
Abstract
Background: Design thinking is a problem-solving framework that has been used to enhance patient experiences, improve clinical outcomes, and refine medical curricula. This study reviewed the use of design thinking in health professions education.
Methods: A search yielded 169 articles, which were excluded if they were: (1) not related to education; (2) lacking an application of design thinking; or (3) not associated with healthcare. The final review yielded 15 articles, which were analyzed using qualitative methods.
Results: All articles were published in 2009 or later and were diverse in their context, participants, and approach. Six studies emphasized the early stages of design thinking, with inspiration and ideation stages fostered through a variety of activities, such as lectures, small group discussions, and workshops. Studies examined a range of outcomes, including self-efficacy, perceptions, and solutions to a specific problem.
Conclusions: Our findings raise important considerations for health professions education, including the extent to which we should: 1) teach design thinking to students as a skill-based tool to prepare students for problem solving in complex healthcare environments; and 2) use design thinking to create, implement, and refine health professions curricula and educational programs. Despite the apparent benefits of design thinking, many questions for health professions education remain.
Keywords: Creativity; Curriculum development; Design thinking; Innovation; Problem solving.
Conflict of interest statement
Ethics approval and consent to participate
No data were collected from or about individuals, therefore consent was not necessary for this study.
Consent for publication
Not applicable – data (e.g. video, details, images) from individuals were not included in this manuscript.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
-
- Roth MT, Mumper RJ, Singleton SF, Lee CR, Rodgers PT, Cox WC, et al. A renaissance in pharmacy education at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. NC Med J. 2014;75(1):48–52. - PubMed
-
- Shaw J. Rethinking the medical curriculum. Harvard magazine website. http://harvardmagazine.com/2015/08/rethinking-the-medical-curriculum. Published August 20, 2015. Accessed 18 Dec 2018.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Medical