Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Mar 22:13:15.
doi: 10.1186/s13033-019-0270-2. eCollection 2019.

The resource group method in severe mental illness: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial and a qualitative multiple case study

Affiliations

The resource group method in severe mental illness: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial and a qualitative multiple case study

Cathelijn D Tjaden et al. Int J Ment Health Syst. .

Abstract

Background: The resource group method provides a structure to facilitate patients' empowerment and recovery processes, and to systematically engage significant others in treatment and care. A patient chooses members of a resource group (RG) that will work together on fulfilling patients' recovery plan. By adopting shared decision-making processes and stimulating collaboration of different support systems, a broad and continuous support of patients' chosen goals and wishes is preserved and problem solving and communication skills of the RG members are addressed.

Objective: The objectives of this study are (1) to establish the effectiveness of the RG method in increasing empowerment in patients with severe mental illnesses (SMI) in the Netherlands; (2) to investigate the cost-effectiveness and cost utility of the RG method; and (3) to qualitatively explore its dynamics and processes.

Methods/design: This multisite randomized controlled trial will compare the effects of the RG-method integrated in Flexible Assertive Community Treatment (FACT) (90 patients) with those of standard FACT (90 patients). Baseline assessments and 9-month and 18-month follow-up assessments will be conducted in face-to-face home visits. The primary outcome measure, empowerment, will be assessed using the Netherlands Empowerment List (NEL). The secondary outcomes will be quality of life (MANSA); personal, community and clinical recovery (I.ROC); general, social and community functioning (WHODAS 2.0); general psychopathological signs and symptoms (BSI-18); and societal costs (TiC-P). An economic evaluation of the cost-effectiveness and cost utility of the RG method will also be conducted. A qualitative multiple case-study will be added to collect patients', RG members' and professionals' perspectives by in-depth interviews, observations and focus groups.

Discussion: This trial will be the first to study the effects of the RG method on empowerment in patients with SMI. By combining clinical-effectiveness data with an economic evaluation and in-depth qualitative information from primary stakeholders, it will provide a detailed overview of the RG method as a mean of improving care for patients with SMI.Trial registration The study has been registered in the Dutch Trial Register, identifier: NTR6737, September 2017.

Keywords: (Flexible) Assertive Community Treatment; Care structure; Community mental health; Empowerment; Family; Family intervention; RACT; Recovery; Resource group; Severe mental illness.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow chart of study design. FACT Flexible Assertive Community Treatment, RG resource group

References

    1. Drake RE, Whitley R. Recovery and severe mental illness: description and analysis. Can J Psychiatry. 2014;59:236–242. doi: 10.1177/070674371405900502. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Law H, Morrison AP. Recovery in psychosis: a Delphi study with experts by experience. Schizophr Bull. 2014;40:1347–1355. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbu047. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Soundy A, Stubbs B, Roskell C, Williams SE, Fox A, Vancampfort D. Identifying the facilitators and processes which influence recovery in individuals with schizophrenia: a systematic review and thematic synthesis. J Ment Health. 2015;24:103–110. doi: 10.3109/09638237.2014.998811. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Deegan P. Recovering our sense of value after being labelled. J Psychosoc Nurs. 1993;31:7–11. - PubMed
    1. Anthony W. Recovery from mental illness: the guiding vision of the mental health service in the 1990s. Psychosoc Rehabil J. 1993;16:11–23.

LinkOut - more resources