Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Jan;92(1):7-14.
doi: 10.15386/cjmed-1015. Epub 2019 Jan 15.

The role of medical registries, potential applications and limitations

Affiliations
Review

The role of medical registries, potential applications and limitations

Bogdan Pop et al. Med Pharm Rep. 2019 Jan.

Abstract

Medical registries provide highly reliable data, challenged hierarchically only by randomized controlled trials. Although registries have been used in several fields of medicine for more than a century and a half, their key role is frequently overlooked and poorly recognized. Medical registries have evolved from calculating basic epidemiological data (incidence, prevalence, mortality) to diverse applications in disease prevention, early diagnosis and screening programs, treatment response, health care planning, decision making and disease control programs. Implementing, maintaining and running a medical registry requires substantial effort. Developing the registry represents a complex task and is one of the major barriers in widespread use of registries. Medical registries have potential to evolve to a next generation by taking benefit from recent semantic web technology developments. This paper is aimed at providing a summary of the basic information available on medical registries and to highlight the progress and potential applications in this field.

Keywords: data accuracy; health care; public health; quality assurance; registries; registries/standards.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Data sources for medical registries and their relationship with the core dataset [2].

References

    1. Solomon DJ, Henry RC, Hogan JG, Van Amburg GH, Taylor J. Evaluation and implementation of public health registries. Public Health Rep. 1991;106:142–150. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gliklich RE, Dreyer NA, Leavy MB. Registries for evaluating patient outcomes: a user’s guide. Government Printing Office; 2014. - PubMed
    1. Maret-Ouda J, Tao W, Wahlin K, Lagergren J. Nordic registry-based cohort studies: Possibilities and pitfalls when combining Nordic registry data. Scand J Public Health. 2017;45(17_suppl):14–19. - PubMed
    1. Parkin DM. The evolution of the population-based cancer registry. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006;6:603–612. - PubMed
    1. Schmidt M, Schmidt SA, Sandegaard JL, Ehrenstein V, Pedersen L, Sørensen HT. The Danish National Patient Registry: a review of content, data quality, and research potential. Clin Epidemiol. 2015;7:449–490. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources