Avoided emissions and conservation of scrub mangroves: potential for a Blue Carbon project in the Gulf of California, Mexico
- PMID: 30958255
- PMCID: PMC6303510
- DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2018.0400
Avoided emissions and conservation of scrub mangroves: potential for a Blue Carbon project in the Gulf of California, Mexico
Abstract
Mangroves are considered ideal ecosystems for Blue Carbon projects. However, because of their short stature, some mangroves ('scrub' mangroves, less than 2 m) do not fulfil the current definition of 'forests', which makes them ineligible for emission reduction programmes such as REDD+. Short stature mangroves can be the dominant form of mangroves in arid and nutrient-poor landscapes, and emissions from their deforestation and degradation could be substantial. Here, we describe a Blue Carbon project in the Gulf of California, Mexico, to illustrate that projects that avoid emissions from deforestation and degradation could provide financial resources to protect mangroves that cannot be included in other emission reduction programmes. The goal of the project is to protect 16 058 ha of mangroves through conservation concessions from the Mexican Federal Government. The cumulative avoided emissions of the project are 2.84 million Mg CO2 over 100 years, valued at $US 426 000 per year (US$15 per Mg CO2 in the California market). The funds could be used for community-based projects that will improve mangrove management, such as surveillance, eradication of invasive species, rehabilitation after tropical storms and environmental education. The strong institutional support, secure financial status, community engagement and clear project boundaries provide favourable conditions to implement this Blue Carbon project. Financial resources from Blue Carbon projects, even in mangroves of short stature, can provide substantial resources to enhance community resilience and mangrove protection.
Keywords: carbon credits; deforestation; degradation; wetlands.
Conflict of interest statement
We have no competing interests.
Figures
References
-
- Barbier EB, Hacker S, Kennedy C, Kock E, Stier A, Silliman B. 2011. The value of estuarine and coastal ecosystem services. Ecol. Monogr. 81, 169–193. ( 10.1890/10-1510.1) - DOI
-
- Duarte CM, Losada IJ, Hendriks IE, Mazarrasa I, Marba N. 2013. The role of coastal plant communities for climate change mitigation and adaptation. Nat. Clim. Chang. 3, 961–968. ( 10.1038/nclimate1970) - DOI
-
- Sasaki N, Putz FE. 2009. Critical need for new definitions of ‘forest’ and ‘forest degradation’ in global climate change agreements. Conserv. Lett. 2, 226–232. ( 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2009.00067.x) - DOI
-
- Arreola-Lizarraga J, Flores-Verdugo F, Ortega-Rubio A. 2004. Structure and litterfall of an arid mangrove stand on the Gulf of California, Mexico. Aquat. Bot. 79, 137–143. ( 10.1016/j.aquabot.2004.01.012) - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources