Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Aug 1;26(8-9):855-870.
doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocz023.

Interventions to increase patient portal use in vulnerable populations: a systematic review

Affiliations

Interventions to increase patient portal use in vulnerable populations: a systematic review

Lisa V Grossman et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc. .

Abstract

Background: More than 100 studies document disparities in patient portal use among vulnerable populations. Developing and testing strategies to reduce disparities in use is essential to ensure portals benefit all populations.

Objective: To systematically review the impact of interventions designed to: (1) increase portal use or predictors of use in vulnerable patient populations, or (2) reduce disparities in use.

Materials and methods: A librarian searched Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane Reviews for studies published before September 1, 2018. Two reviewers independently selected English-language research articles that evaluated any interventions designed to impact an eligible outcome. One reviewer extracted data and categorized interventions, then another assessed accuracy. Two reviewers independently assessed risk of bias.

Results: Out of 18 included studies, 15 (83%) assessed an intervention's impact on portal use, 7 (39%) on predictors of use, and 1 (6%) on disparities in use. Most interventions studied focused on the individual (13 out of 26, 50%), as opposed to facilitating conditions, such as the tool, task, environment, or organization (SEIPS model). Twelve studies (67%) reported a statistically significant increase in portal use or predictors of use, or reduced disparities. Five studies (28%) had high or unclear risk of bias.

Conclusion: Individually focused interventions have the most evidence for increasing portal use in vulnerable populations. Interventions affecting other system elements (tool, task, environment, organization) have not been sufficiently studied to draw conclusions. Given the well-established evidence for disparities in use and the limited research on effective interventions, research should move beyond identifying disparities to systematically addressing them at multiple levels.

Keywords: consumer health information; healthcare disparities; patient access to records; patient portals; personal health records; vulnerable populations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flow diagram for study selection
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
SEIPS system components intervened on in included studies

References

    1. Delbanco T, Walker J, Darer JD, et al. Open notes: doctors and patients signing on. Ann Intern Med 2010; 153 (2): 121–5. - PubMed
    1. Delbanco T, Walker J, Bell SK, et al. Inviting patients to read their doctors’ notes: a quasi-experimental study and a look ahead. Ann Intern Med 2012; 157 (7): 461–70. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Walker J, Leveille SG, Ngo L, et al. Inviting patients to read their doctors’ notes: patients and doctors look ahead. Ann Intern Med 2011; 155 (12): 811.. - PMC - PubMed
    1. American Hospital Association. Individuals’ Ability to Electronically Access Their Hospital Medical Records, Perform Key Tasks Is Growing. 2016. http://www.aha.org/research/reports/tw/16jul-tw-healthIT.pdf. Accessed February 8, 2017.
    1. HealthIT.gov. What is a patient portal? https://www.healthit.gov/providers-professionals/faqs/what-patient-portal. Accessed August 8, 2017.

Publication types