Prevalence of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus sp. (MRS) in Different Companion Animals and Determination of Risk Factors for Colonization with MRS
- PMID: 30959767
- PMCID: PMC6627599
- DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics8020036
Prevalence of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus sp. (MRS) in Different Companion Animals and Determination of Risk Factors for Colonization with MRS
Abstract
The aim of this study was to detect the prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus sp. (MRS) in populations of companion animals that either have previously been exposed or have not been exposed to antibiotic therapy or veterinary facilities, and if owners' healthcare profession had an influence on colonization with MRS. In addition, the antimicrobial resistance pheno- and genotype were investigated and risks for colonization with MRS were assessed. During this study, 347 nasal swabs (dogs n = 152; cats n = 107; rabbits n = 88) were investigated for the presence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). In addition, 131 nasal swabs (dogs n = 79; cats n = 47; rabbits = 3; guinea pigs = 2) were examined for the presence of MRSA but also other MRS. In total, 23 MRS isolates belonged to nine staphylococcal species: Staphylococcus epidermidis (n = 11), Staphylococcus warneri (n = 3), Staphylococcus hominis (n = 2), Staphylococcus pseudintermedius (n = 2), and singletons Staphylococcus cohnii, Staphylococcus sciuri, Staphylococcus fleurettii, Staphylococcus lentus, and Staphylococcus haemolyticus. Twenty isolates displayed a multidrug-resistant phenotype. Various resistance and biocide resistance genes were detected among the examined staphylococci. Risk assessment for MRS colonization was conducted using a number of factors, including animal species, breed, age, gender, recent veterinary health care hospitalization, and antibiotic prescription, resulting in recent veterinary health care hospitalization being a significant risk factor. The detection of multidrug-resistant MRS in healthy animals is of importance due to their zoonotic potential.
Keywords: MRSA; SCCmec typing; animals; antibiotic resistance; dru typing; methicillin resistance; risk factors.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
-
- Morris D.O., Loeffler A., Davis M.F., Guardabassi L., Weese J.S. Recommendations for approaches to meticillin-resistant staphylococcal infections of small animals: Diagnosis, therapeutic considerations and preventative measures.: Clinical Consensus Guidelines of the World Association for Veterinary Dermatology. Vet. Dermatol. 2017;28:304-e69. doi: 10.1111/vde.12444. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Becker K., Ballhausen B., Köck R., Kriegeskorte A. Methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus isolates: The “mec alphabet” with specific consideration of mecC, a mec homolog associated with zoonotic S. aureus lineages. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 2014;304:794–804. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2014.06.007. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Warren D.K., Prager M., Munigala S., Wallace M.A., Kennedy C.R., Bommarito K.M., Mazuski J.E., Burnham C.A. Prevalence of qacA/B Genes and Mupirocin Resistance among Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Isolates in the Setting of Chlorhexidine Bathing without Mupirocin. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 2016;37:590–597. doi: 10.1017/ice.2016.1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
