Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Mar 6;11(3):438.
doi: 10.3390/polym11030438.

Solid-State Polymerization of Poly(Ethylene Furanoate) Biobased Polyester, III: Extended Study on Effect of Catalyst Type on Molecular Weight Increase

Affiliations

Solid-State Polymerization of Poly(Ethylene Furanoate) Biobased Polyester, III: Extended Study on Effect of Catalyst Type on Molecular Weight Increase

Yosra Chebbi et al. Polymers (Basel). .

Abstract

In this study, the synthesis of poly(ethylene furanoate) (PEF), catalyzed by five different catalysts-antimony acetate (III) (Sb Ac), zirconium (IV) isopropoxide isopropanal (Zr Is Ip), antimony (III) oxide (Sb Ox), zirconium (IV) 2,4-pentanedionate (Zr Pe) and germanium (IV) oxide (Ge Ox)-via an industrially common combination of melt polymerization and subsequent solid-state polymerization (SSP) is presented. In all reactions, proper amounts of 2,5-dimethylfuran-dicarboxylate (DMFD) and ethylene glycol (EG) in a molar ratio of DMFD/EG= 1/2 and 400 ppm of catalyst were used. Polyester samples were subjected to SSP procedure, under vacuum application, at different reaction times (1, 2, 3.5, and 5 h) and temperatures of 190, 200, and 205 °C. Carboxyl end-groups concentration (⁻COOH), intrinsic viscosity (IV), and thermal properties, via differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), were measured for all resultant polymers to study the effect of the used catalysts on the molecular weight increase of PEF during SSP process. As was expected, it was found that with increasing the SSP time and temperature, the intrinsic viscosity and the average molecular weight of PEF steadily increased. In contrast, the number of carboxyl end-groups content showed the opposite trend as intrinsic viscosity, that is, gradually decreasing during SSP time and temperature increase. It is worthy to note that thanks to the SSP process an obvious and continuous enhancement in the thermal properties of the prepared PEF samples was attained, in which their melting temperatures (Tm) and degree of crystallinity (Xc) increase progressively with increasing of reaction time and temperature. To predict the time evolution of polymers IV, as well as the hydroxyl and carboxyl content of PEF polyesters during the SSP, a simple kinetic model was developed. From both the theoretical simulation results and the experimental measurements, it was demonstrated that surely the Zr Is Ip catalyst shows the best catalytic characteristics compared to all other used catalysts herein, that is, leading in reducing-in a spectacular way-the activation energy of the involved both transesterification and esterification reactions during SSP.

Keywords: catalysts; poly(ethylene furanoate); polyester; solid-state polycondensation; thermal properties.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
X-ray diffraction analysis (WAXD) patterns of as received poly(ethylene furanoate) (PEF) samples after melt polycondensation using five different catalysts (Ge Ox, Zr Is Ip, Sb Ac, Sb Ox, and Zr Pe).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Variation of the intrinsic viscosity with time during the solid-state polymerization (SSP) of PEF using different catalysts—Sb Ac (a), Ge Ox (b), Sb Ox (c), Zr Is Ip (d), and Zr Pe (e)—at different temperatures. Continuous lines represent the theoretical kinetic model simulation results.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Variation of the intrinsic viscosity with time during the solid-state polymerization (SSP) of PEF using different catalysts—Sb Ac (a), Ge Ox (b), Sb Ox (c), Zr Is Ip (d), and Zr Pe (e)—at different temperatures. Continuous lines represent the theoretical kinetic model simulation results.
Figure 3
Figure 3
(–COOH) Variation with time during SSP: PEF/Sb Ac (a), PEF/Ge Ox (b), PEF/Sb Ox (c), PEF/Zr Is Ip (d), and PEF/Zr Pe (e) at different temperatures. Continuous lines represent the theoretical kinetic model simulation results.
Figure 3
Figure 3
(–COOH) Variation with time during SSP: PEF/Sb Ac (a), PEF/Ge Ox (b), PEF/Sb Ox (c), PEF/Zr Is Ip (d), and PEF/Zr Pe (e) at different temperatures. Continuous lines represent the theoretical kinetic model simulation results.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Variation of hydroxyl end-groups with time during PEF/Sb Ac (a), PEF/Ge Ox (b), PEF/Sb Ox (c), PEF/Zr Is Ip (d), and PEF/Zr Pe (e) SSP at different temperatures. Continuous lines represent the theoretical kinetic model simulation result.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Variation of hydroxyl end-groups with time during PEF/Sb Ac (a), PEF/Ge Ox (b), PEF/Sb Ox (c), PEF/Zr Is Ip (d), and PEF/Zr Pe (e) SSP at different temperatures. Continuous lines represent the theoretical kinetic model simulation result.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Variation of the estimated kinetic rate constants for polycondensation (k1) and esterification (k2) with temperature for all catalytic systems investigated.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Variation of the estimated kinetic rate constants for polycondensation (k1) and esterification (k2) with temperature for all catalytic systems investigated.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) thermograms of different PEF/Zr Is Ip samples prepared after SSP at different temperatures and times: (a) 190 °C, (b) 200 °C, and (c) 205 °C.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Effect of SSP time and temperature on the evolution of the degree of crystallinity of PEF samples: (a) PEF/Sb Ac, (b) PEF/Ge Ox, (c) PEF/Sb Ox, (d) PEF/Zr Is Ip, and (e) PEF/Zr Pe.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Effect of SSP time and temperature on the evolution of the degree of crystallinity of PEF samples: (a) PEF/Sb Ac, (b) PEF/Ge Ox, (c) PEF/Sb Ox, (d) PEF/Zr Is Ip, and (e) PEF/Zr Pe.

References

    1. Gandini A. Polymers from Renewable Resources: A Challenge for the Future of Macromolecular Materials. Macromolecules. 2008;41:9491–9504. doi: 10.1021/ma801735u. - DOI
    1. Walther G. High-Performance Polymers from Nature: Catalytic Routes and Processes for Industry. ChemSusChem. 2014;7:2081–2088. doi: 10.1002/cssc.201402379. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Meier M.A.R., Metzger J.O., Schubert U.S. Plant oil renewable resources as green alternatives in polymer science. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2007;36:1788–1802. doi: 10.1039/b703294c. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gandini A., Lacerda T.M., Carvalho A.J.F., Trovatti E. Progress of Polymers from Renewable Resources: Furans, Vegetable Oils, and Polysaccharides. Chem. Rev. 2016;116:1637–1669. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00264. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Llevot A., Dannecker P.K., Von Czapiewski M., Over L.C., Söyler Z., Meier M.A.R. Renewability is not Enough: Recent Advances in the Sustainable Synthesis of Biomass-Derived Monomers and Polymers. Chem. Eur. J. 2016;22:11510–11521. doi: 10.1002/chem.201602068. - DOI - PubMed